-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 543
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[portsorch]: Bring the physical ports up are only after buffer configuration was applied #515
Changes from 3 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ BufferOrch::BufferOrch(DBConnector *db, vector<string> &tableNames) : Orch(db, t | |
{ | ||
SWSS_LOG_ENTER(); | ||
initTableHandlers(); | ||
initBufferReadyLists(db); | ||
}; | ||
|
||
void BufferOrch::initTableHandlers() | ||
|
@@ -42,6 +43,59 @@ void BufferOrch::initTableHandlers() | |
m_bufferHandlerMap.insert(buffer_handler_pair(CFG_BUFFER_PORT_EGRESS_PROFILE_LIST_NAME, &BufferOrch::processEgressBufferProfileList)); | ||
} | ||
|
||
void BufferOrch::initBufferReadyLists(DBConnector *db) | ||
{ | ||
SWSS_LOG_ENTER(); | ||
|
||
Table pg_table(db, CFG_BUFFER_PG_TABLE_NAME); | ||
initBufferReadyList(pg_table); | ||
|
||
Table queue_table(db, CFG_BUFFER_QUEUE_TABLE_NAME); | ||
initBufferReadyList(queue_table); | ||
} | ||
|
||
void BufferOrch::initBufferReadyList(Table& table) | ||
{ | ||
SWSS_LOG_ENTER(); | ||
|
||
std::vector<std::string> keys; | ||
table.getKeys(keys); | ||
|
||
for (const auto& key: keys) | ||
{ | ||
m_ready_list[key] = false; | ||
|
||
auto tokens = tokenize(key, config_db_key_delimiter); | ||
if (tokens.size() != 2) | ||
{ | ||
SWSS_LOG_ERROR("Wrong format of a table '%s' key '%s'. Skip it", table.getTableName().c_str(), key.c_str()); | ||
continue; | ||
} | ||
|
||
auto port_names = tokenize(tokens[0], list_item_delimiter); | ||
|
||
for(const auto& port_name: port_names) | ||
{ | ||
m_port_ready_list_ref[port_name].push_back(key); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
bool BufferOrch::isPortReady(const std::string& port_name) const | ||
{ | ||
SWSS_LOG_ENTER(); | ||
|
||
const auto& list_of_keys = m_port_ready_list_ref.at(port_name); | ||
|
||
bool result = true; | ||
for (const auto& key: list_of_keys) | ||
{ | ||
result &= m_ready_list.at(key); | ||
} | ||
|
||
return result; | ||
} | ||
|
||
task_process_status BufferOrch::processBufferPool(Consumer &consumer) | ||
{ | ||
SWSS_LOG_ENTER(); | ||
|
@@ -315,7 +369,7 @@ task_process_status BufferOrch::processQueue(Consumer &consumer) | |
auto it = consumer.m_toSync.begin(); | ||
KeyOpFieldsValuesTuple tuple = it->second; | ||
sai_object_id_t sai_buffer_profile; | ||
string key = kfvKey(tuple); | ||
const string key = kfvKey(tuple); | ||
string op = kfvOp(tuple); | ||
vector<string> tokens; | ||
sai_uint32_t range_low, range_high; | ||
|
@@ -374,6 +428,16 @@ task_process_status BufferOrch::processQueue(Consumer &consumer) | |
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (m_ready_list.find(key) != m_ready_list.end()) | ||
{ | ||
m_ready_list[key] = true; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
search the key twice There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. can you please elaborate on it? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
vs
I think first case is more readable, although it might be slightly slower in case the compiler will not optimize it. That code is not on he hot path, so I preferred to use better readability here. |
||
} | ||
else | ||
{ | ||
SWSS_LOG_ERROR("Queue profile '%s' was inserted after BufferOrch init", key.c_str()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
return task_process_status::task_success; | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
@@ -386,7 +450,7 @@ task_process_status BufferOrch::processPriorityGroup(Consumer &consumer) | |
auto it = consumer.m_toSync.begin(); | ||
KeyOpFieldsValuesTuple tuple = it->second; | ||
sai_object_id_t sai_buffer_profile; | ||
string key = kfvKey(tuple); | ||
const string key = kfvKey(tuple); | ||
string op = kfvOp(tuple); | ||
vector<string> tokens; | ||
sai_uint32_t range_low, range_high; | ||
|
@@ -451,6 +515,16 @@ task_process_status BufferOrch::processPriorityGroup(Consumer &consumer) | |
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (m_ready_list.find(key) != m_ready_list.end()) | ||
{ | ||
m_ready_list[key] = true; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the same |
||
} | ||
else | ||
{ | ||
SWSS_LOG_ERROR("PG profile '%s' was inserted after BufferOrch init", key.c_str()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
return task_process_status::task_success; | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ | ||
from swsscommon import swsscommon | ||
import time | ||
|
||
# The test check that the ports will be up, when the admin state is UP by conf db. | ||
|
||
def test_PortsAreUpAfterBuffers(dvs): | ||
num_ports = 32 | ||
asic_db = swsscommon.DBConnector(swsscommon.ASIC_DB, dvs.redis_sock, 0) | ||
conf_db = swsscommon.DBConnector(swsscommon.CONFIG_DB, dvs.redis_sock, 0) | ||
|
||
conf_port_table = swsscommon.Table(conf_db, "PORT") | ||
asic_port_table = swsscommon.Table(asic_db, "ASIC_STATE:SAI_OBJECT_TYPE_PORT") | ||
|
||
# enable all ports | ||
fvs = swsscommon.FieldValuePairs([("admin_status", "up")]) | ||
for i in range(0, num_ports): | ||
conf_port_table.set("Ethernet%d" % (i*4), fvs) | ||
|
||
time.sleep(5) | ||
|
||
# check that the ports are enabled in ASIC | ||
asic_port_records = asic_port_table.getKeys() | ||
assert len(asic_port_records) == (num_ports + 1), "Number of port records doesn't match number of ports" # +CPU port | ||
num_set = 0 | ||
for k in asic_port_records: | ||
status, fvs = asic_port_table.get(k) | ||
assert status, "Got an error when get a key" | ||
for fv in fvs: | ||
if fv[0] == "SAI_PORT_ATTR_ADMIN_STATE": | ||
assert fv[1] == "true", "The port isn't UP as expected" | ||
num_set += 1 | ||
# make sure that state is set for all "num_ports" ports | ||
assert num_set == num_ports, "Not all ports are up" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Better not use bitwise operator on bool. #Closed