[dualtor][route_check] filter out soc_ipv6
#2899
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
zjswhhh
force-pushed
the
route_check_master
branch
from
cc3be54
to
4e92b27
Compare
prsunny
previously approved these changes
Jul 11, 2023
|
Please add a test for the same |
lolyu
reviewed
Jul 11, 2023
zjswhhh
force-pushed
the
route_check_master
branch
from
e2e3194
to
ec634cc
Compare
lolyu
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2023
yxieca
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2023
What I did Skip soc_ipv6 when comparing appl_db and asic_db route entries on active-active dualtor. Because it's creating false alarms when tunnel route is added for soc ips. The route is meant to be programmed in asic only. sign-off: Jing Zhang zhangjing@microsoft.com How I did it How to verify it Run the updated script on active-active dualtor devices.
StormLiangMS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2023
What I did Skip soc_ipv6 when comparing appl_db and asic_db route entries on active-active dualtor. Because it's creating false alarms when tunnel route is added for soc ips. The route is meant to be programmed in asic only. sign-off: Jing Zhang zhangjing@microsoft.com How I did it How to verify it Run the updated script on active-active dualtor devices.
rajkumar38
pushed a commit
to rajkumar38/sonic-utilities
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2023
What I did Skip soc_ipv6 when comparing appl_db and asic_db route entries on active-active dualtor. Because it's creating false alarms when tunnel route is added for soc ips. The route is meant to be programmed in asic only. sign-off: Jing Zhang zhangjing@microsoft.com How I did it How to verify it Run the updated script on active-active dualtor devices.
pdhruv-marvell
pushed a commit
to pdhruv-marvell/sonic-utilities
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 23, 2023
What I did Skip soc_ipv6 when comparing appl_db and asic_db route entries on active-active dualtor. Because it's creating false alarms when tunnel route is added for soc ips. The route is meant to be programmed in asic only. sign-off: Jing Zhang zhangjing@microsoft.com How I did it How to verify it Run the updated script on active-active dualtor devices.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What I did
Skip
soc_ipv6when comparing appl_db and asic_db route entries onactive-activedualtor. Because it's creating false alarms when tunnel route is added for soc ips. The route is meant to be programmed in asic only.ADO#: 24499494
sign-off: Jing Zhang zhangjing@microsoft.com
How I did it
How to verify it
Run the updated script on active-active dualtor devices.
Previous command output (if the output of a command-line utility has changed)
New command output (if the output of a command-line utility has changed)