Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to v0.33.0 #17

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 9, 2023

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 9, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@vitest/coverage-c8 (source) 0.30.1 -> 0.33.0 age adoption passing confidence
vitest 0.30.1 -> 0.33.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (@​vitest/coverage-c8)

v0.33.0

Compare Source

   🚨 Breaking Changes
  • Revert default include patterns  -  by @​so1ve #​3729
    • 0.32.0 changed the default include globs to be compatible with Jest. After a discussion with the community, we are reverting this change because it turned out to be non-intuitive.
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.4

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.3

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.2

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.1

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.0

Compare Source

   🚨 Breaking Changes
  • Throw an error, if the module cannot be resolved  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3307 (1ad63)
    • Vitest used to fall back to the original import when it could not resolve it to the file path or the virtual module. This leads to hard-to-find module graph mismatches if you had incorrect alias or relied on relative imports to be resolved to the project root (which is usual behavior in TypeScript) because the code accidentally "worked". With this release, Vitest will now throw an error if it cannot resolve the module - there are possible edge cases that are not covered yet, so if you have any problems with this, please open a separate issue with reproduction.
  • Improve globs  -  by @​nickmccurdy in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3392 (19ecc)
    • Vitest now has glob patterns similar to Jest for better compatibility. It's possible that some files will be considered test files when previously they were not. For example, Vitest now considers test.js to be a test file. Also any file in __tests__ is now considered to be a test, not just files with test or spec suffix.
  • Add @vitest/coverage-v8 package  -  by @​AriPerkkio in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3339 (82112)
    • Vitest now uses v8 code coverage directly for better performance. @vitest/coverage-c8 is deprecated as Vitest no longer uses c8 package for coverage output. It will not be updated anymore, and Vitest will fail in the next version if the user has c8 as their coverage provider. Please, install the new @vitest/coverage-v8 package if you previously used @vitest/coverage-c8.
  • mocker: Don't restore mock to the original if the module is automocked  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3518 (c1004)
    • spy.mockRestore on auto-mocked named exports will no longer restore their implementation to the actual function. This behavior better matches what Jest does.
   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.31.4

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.31.3

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.31.2

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.31.1

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.31.0

Compare Source

   🚨 Breaking Changes
  • Remove browser from allowed pools inside poolMatchGlob config option. Please, use Vitest workspaces for running tests in the browser.

  • Move assertion declarations to expect package  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3294 (cf3af)

    • The change should be minor:
    - declare namespace Vi {
    + declare module 'vitest' {
       interface Assertion<T = any> extends CustomMatchers<T> {}
       interface AsymmetricMatchersContaining extends CustomMatchers {}
    }
   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 4pm on friday,before 9am on monday,every weekend" in timezone Europe/Paris, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from 2b8c0cf to ffbfe04 Compare July 9, 2023 14:46
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to ^0.33.0 chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to v0.33.0 Jul 9, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch from ffbfe04 to 999b54d Compare July 9, 2023 14:51
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch from 999b54d to 28b6fe4 Compare July 9, 2023 15:00
@renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jul 9, 2023

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@bodinsamuel bodinsamuel merged commit 5155e0c into chore/renovateBaseBranch Jul 9, 2023
@bodinsamuel bodinsamuel deleted the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch July 9, 2023 15:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant