-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 764
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix TypeVariable/WildcardType recursion causing stackoverflows #948
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7b73ce0
Port Gson Types recursion fix for subtypeOf/supertypeOf
ZacSweers 62e896b
Port Gson Type resolve() recursion fix for type variables
ZacSweers 86b5eda
Capture adapter to make checkstyle happy
ZacSweers 37aaaae
Move RecursiveTypesResolveTest out of internal package
ZacSweers dafa839
Use moshi convention for tests
ZacSweers 5136b6e
2 is not 1
ZacSweers File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
77 changes: 77 additions & 0 deletions
77
moshi/src/test/java/com/squareup/moshi/RecursiveTypesResolveTest.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ | ||
/* | ||
* Copyright (C) 2017 Gson Authors | ||
* | ||
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | ||
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | ||
* You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
* | ||
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
* limitations under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
package com.squareup.moshi; | ||
|
||
import com.squareup.moshi.internal.Util; | ||
import org.junit.Test; | ||
|
||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; | ||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Test fixes for infinite recursion on {@link Util#resolve(java.lang.reflect.Type, Class, | ||
* java.lang.reflect.Type)}, described at <a href="https://github.com/google/gson/issues/440">Issue #440</a> | ||
* and similar issues. | ||
* <p> | ||
* These tests originally caused {@link StackOverflowError} because of infinite recursion on attempts to | ||
* resolve generics on types, with an intermediate types like 'Foo2<? extends ? super ? extends ... ? extends A>' | ||
* <p> | ||
* Adapted from https://github.com/google/gson/commit/a300148003e3a067875b1444e8268b6e0f0e0e02 in | ||
* service of https://github.com/square/moshi/issues/338. | ||
*/ | ||
public final class RecursiveTypesResolveTest { | ||
|
||
private static class Foo1<A> { | ||
public Foo2<? extends A> foo2; | ||
} | ||
|
||
private static class Foo2<B> { | ||
public Foo1<? super B> foo1; | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Test simplest case of recursion. | ||
*/ | ||
@Test public void recursiveResolveSimple() { | ||
JsonAdapter<Foo1> adapter = new Moshi.Builder().build().adapter(Foo1.class); | ||
assertNotNull(adapter); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// | ||
// Tests belows check the behaviour of the methods changed for the fix | ||
// | ||
|
||
@Test public void doubleSupertype() { | ||
assertEquals(Types.supertypeOf(Number.class), | ||
Types.supertypeOf(Types.supertypeOf(Number.class))); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test public void doubleSubtype() { | ||
assertEquals(Types.subtypeOf(Number.class), | ||
Types.subtypeOf(Types.subtypeOf(Number.class))); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test public void superSubtype() { | ||
assertEquals(Types.subtypeOf(Object.class), | ||
Types.supertypeOf(Types.subtypeOf(Number.class))); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test public void subSupertype() { | ||
assertEquals(Types.subtypeOf(Object.class), | ||
Types.subtypeOf(Types.supertypeOf(Number.class))); | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: https://publicobject.com/2016/02/08/linkedhashmap-is-always-better-than-hashmap/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don‘t love this solution because it allocates a collection always even though this case is quite rare.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What if we initialize with an empty capacity? Still an instance but minimizes the footprint for non-typevar users
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lets do that, but use
null
as the sentinel for empty?