Allow content types text/xml and application/xml to be used interchangeably #173
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gadomski
reviewed
May 28, 2024
gadomski
approved these changes
May 28, 2024
|
LGTM! Thanks for the contribution! |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #173 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 84.46% 84.46%
=======================================
Files 16 16
Lines 991 991
=======================================
Hits 837 837
Misses 154 154 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Allow content types text/xml and application/xml to be used interchangeably
Related issues and pull requests
N/A
Description
The XML content types
text/xmlandapplication/xmlare sometimes used interchangeably in different places. For example, the STAC metadata may reference one, but the web server for downloading may report the other one. Right now, such a scenario would cause an error when content type validation is enabled.https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2376#section-3
Checklist