Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency expect-type to ^0.20.0 #774

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 30, 2023

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
expect-type ^0.15.0 -> ^0.20.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

mmkal/expect-type (expect-type)

v0.20.0

Compare Source

Breaking changes

This change updates how overloaded functions are treated. Now, .parameters gives you a union of the parameter-tuples that a function can take. For example, given the following type:

type Factorize = {
  (input: number): number[]
  (input: bigint): bigint[]
}

Behvaiour before:

expectTypeOf<Factorize>().parameters.toEqualTypeOf<[bigint]>()

Behaviour now:

expectTypeOf<Factorize>().parameters.toEqualTypeOf<[number] | [bigint]>()

There were similar changes for .returns, .parameter(...), and .toBeCallableWith. Also, overloaded functions are now differentiated properly when using .branded.toEqualTypeOf (this was a bug that it seems nobody found).

See #​83 for more details or look at the updated docs (including a new section called "Overloaded functions", which has more info on how this behaviour differs for TypeScript versions before 5.3).

What's Changed

Full Changelog: mmkal/expect-type@v0.19.0...v0.20.0

v0.19.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: mmkal/expect-type@0.18.0...0.19.0

v0.18.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: mmkal/expect-type@v0.17.3...0.18.0

v0.17.3

Compare Source

v0.17.2

Compare Source

Diff(truncated - scroll right!):

test('toEqualTypeOf with tuples', () => {
  const assertion = `expectTypeOf<[[number], [1], []]>().toEqualTypeOf<[[number], [2], []]>()`
  expect(tsErrors(assertion)).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
-    "test/test.ts:999:999 - error TS2344: Type '[[number], [2], []]' does not satisfy the constraint '{ [x: number]: { [x: number]: number; [iterator]: (() => IterableIterator<1>) | (() => IterableIterator<number>) | (() => IterableIterator<never>); [unscopables]: (() => { copyWithin: boolean; entries: boolean; fill: boolean; find: boolean; findIndex: boolean; keys: boolean; values: boolean; }) | (() => { copyWithin: boolean; entries: boolean; fill: boolean; find: boolean; findIndex: boolean; keys: boolean; values: boolean; }) | (() => { copyWithin: boolean; entries: boolean; fill: boolean; find: boolean; findIndex: boolean; keys: boolean; values: boolean; }); length: 0 | 1; toString:  ... truncated!!!!'.
-      Types of property 'sort' are incompatible.
-        Type '(compareFn?: ((a: [] | [number] | [2], b: [] | [number] | [2]) => number) | undefined) => [[number], [2], []]' is not assignable to type '\\"Expected: function, Actual: function\\"'.
+    "test/test.ts:999:999 - error TS2344: Type '[[number], [2], []]' does not satisfy the constraint '{ 0: { 0: number; }; 1: { 0: \\"Expected: literal number: 2, Actual: literal number: 1\\"; }; 2: {}; }'.
+      The types of '1[0]' are incompatible between these types.
+        Type '2' is not assignable to type '\\"Expected: literal number: 2, Actual: literal number: 1\\"'.
    999 expectTypeOf<[[number], [1], []]>().toEqualTypeOf<[[number], [2], []]>()
                                                          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"
  `)
})

v0.17.1

Compare Source

  • disallow .not and .branded together cf38918

(this was actually documented in the v0.17.0 release but really it was only pushed here)

v0.17.0

Compare Source

#​16 went in to - hopefully - significantly improve the error messages produce on failing assertions. Here's an example of how vitest's failing tests were improved:

Before:

image

After:

image

Docs copied from the readme about how to interpret these error messages


Error messages

When types don't match, .toEqualTypeOf and .toMatchTypeOf use a special helper type to produce error messages that are as actionable as possible. But there's a bit of an nuance to understanding them. Since the assertions are written "fluently", the failure should be on the "expected" type, not the "actual" type (expect<Actual>().toEqualTypeOf<Expected>()). This means that type errors can be a little confusing - so this library produces a MismatchInfo type to try to make explicit what the expectation is. For example:

expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf<{a: string}>()

Is an assertion that will fail, since {a: 1} has type {a: number} and not {a: string}. The error message in this case will read something like this:

test/test.ts:999:999 - error TS2344: Type '{ a: string; }' does not satisfy the constraint '{ a: \\"Expected: string, Actual: number\\"; }'.
  Types of property 'a' are incompatible.
    Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\\"Expected: string, Actual: number\\"'.

999 expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf<{a: string}>()

Note that the type constraint reported is a human-readable messaging specifying both the "expected" and "actual" types. Rather than taking the sentence Types of property 'a' are incompatible // Type 'string' is not assignable to type "Expected: string, Actual: number" literally - just look at the property name ('a') and the message: Expected: string, Actual: number. This will tell you what's wrong, in most cases. Extremely complex types will of course be more effort to debug, and may require some experimentation. Please raise an issue if the error messages are actually misleading.

The toBe... methods (like toBeString, toBeNumber, toBeVoid etc.) fail by resolving to a non-callable type when the Actual type under test doesn't match up. For example, the failure for an assertion like expectTypeOf(1).toBeString() will look something like this:

test/test.ts:999:999 - error TS2349: This expression is not callable.
  Type 'ExpectString<number>' has no call signatures.

999 expectTypeOf(1).toBeString()
                    ~~~~~~~~~~

The This expression is not callable part isn't all that helpful - the meaningful error is the next line, Type 'ExpectString<number> has no call signatures. This essentially means you passed a number but asserted it should be a string.

If TypeScript added support for "throw" types these error messagess could be improved. Until then they will take a certain amount of squinting.

Concrete "expected" objects vs typeargs

Error messages for an assertion like this:

expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf({a: ''})

Will be less helpful than for an assertion like this:

expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf<{a: string}>()

This is because the TypeScript compiler needs to infer the typearg for the .toEqualTypeOf({a: ''}) style, and this library can only mark it as a failure by comparing it against a generic Mismatch type. So, where possible, use a typearg rather than a concrete type for .toEqualTypeOf and toMatchTypeOf. If it's much more convenient to compare two concrete types, you can use typeof:

const one = valueFromFunctionOne({some: {complex: inputs}})
const two = valueFromFunctionTwo({some: {other: inputs}})

expectTypeOf(one).toEqualTypeof<typeof two>()

Kinda-breaking changes: essentially none, but technically, .branded no longer returns a "full" ExpectTypeOf instance at compile-time. Previously you could do this:

expectTypeOf<{a: {b: 1} & {c: 1}}>().branded.not.toEqualTypeOf<{a: {b: 1; c: ''}}>()
expectTypeOf<{a: {b: 1} & {c: 1}}>().not.branded.toEqualTypeOf<{a: {b: 1; c: ''}}>()

Now that won't work (and it was always slightly nonsensical), so you'd have to use // @&#8203;ts-expect-error instead of not if you have a negated case where you need branded:

// @&#8203;ts-expect-error
expectTypeOf<{a: {b: 1} & {c: 1}}>().branded.not.toEqualTypeOf<{a: {b: 1; c: ''}}>()

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: mmkal/expect-type@v0.16.0...v0.17.0

v0.16.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

Note that #​21 has affected behavior for intersection types, which can result in (arguably) false errors:

// @&#8203;ts-expect-error the following line doesn't compile, even though the types are arguably the same.
// See https://github.com/mmkal/expect-type/pull/21
expectTypeOf<{a: 1} & {b: 2}>().toEqualTypeOf<{a: 1; b: 2}>()

Full Changelog: mmkal/expect-type@v0.15.0...v16.0.0


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from 7a61dcd to 09a96cd Compare June 20, 2023 18:31
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch from 09a96cd to 4b1f06b Compare July 1, 2023 04:45
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch from 4b1f06b to c380e77 Compare July 10, 2023 05:20
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch 7 times, most recently from 20688c2 to 75a573a Compare July 22, 2023 12:22
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch from 75a573a to 3f40c4d Compare July 28, 2023 06:29
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch from 3f40c4d to 029708e Compare August 7, 2023 04:47
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from 3507c1e to 8a33180 Compare August 22, 2023 04:42
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch from 8a33180 to 761ae42 Compare August 29, 2023 07:02
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from bd6ae4d to c7f05c9 Compare September 12, 2023 07:46
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from 3e466f8 to faa7998 Compare September 26, 2023 03:19
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency expect-type to ^0.16.0 chore(deps): update dependency expect-type to ^0.17.0 Oct 3, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch from faa7998 to 16810b5 Compare October 3, 2023 04:42
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch 3 times, most recently from 5dc4c34 to d682d7f Compare November 14, 2023 03:21
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch 4 times, most recently from ee1a039 to c7d83bd Compare November 21, 2023 10:04
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch 10 times, most recently from 5d24ac0 to 7ba5579 Compare July 16, 2024 11:33
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from c96aefc to 944e3bc Compare July 30, 2024 06:44
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch from 944e3bc to 27d41a6 Compare August 6, 2024 06:25
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch from 27d41a6 to c1bc834 Compare August 13, 2024 06:29
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from 93d9724 to a4535cf Compare August 20, 2024 19:38
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency expect-type to ^0.19.0 chore(deps): update dependency expect-type to ^0.20.0 Aug 20, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch 3 times, most recently from b6b6447 to 0980631 Compare August 27, 2024 08:32
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from 034fd12 to f02c2d0 Compare September 10, 2024 06:48
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch 3 times, most recently from 3a01573 to 44e2df5 Compare September 29, 2024 06:55
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/expect-type-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from b261311 to 89feba9 Compare October 30, 2024 06:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants