Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix and document some usages of defaultRuntimeConfig #4147

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

Conversation

zah
Copy link
Contributor

@zah zah commented Sep 19, 2022

#4134 follow-up work, discussed here:
#4134 (comment)

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 19, 2022

Unit Test Results

         9 files  ±0       882 suites  ±0   23m 27s ⏱️ - 3m 14s
  2 685 tests ±0    2 480 ✔️ ±0  205 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
11 612 runs  ±0  11 375 ✔️ ±0  237 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 064d973. ± Comparison against base commit 90eb2cc.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@arnetheduck
Copy link
Member

The windows test failure here looks consistent, so it should be looked into before merging

@zah
Copy link
Contributor Author

zah commented Oct 13, 2022

The failure was tracked down to the fact that we were not using the latest Nim 1.6 fixes because the respective branch in the Status Nim repo was stale.

@zah zah force-pushed the 4134-follow-up branch 2 times, most recently from d4cf0b9 to 86485ac Compare October 19, 2022 21:56
arnetheduck added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2022
Without this, tools like `ncli_db` require command line parameter to
process mainnet blocks, which is a regression since the merge - this is
a subset of #4147.
arnetheduck added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2022
Without this, tools like `ncli_db` require command line parameter to
process mainnet blocks, which is a regression since the merge - this is
a subset of #4147.
Other changes:

* Make the light client store compatible with phase0-only networks
  and simulations
@zah zah merged commit 7c78364 into unstable Dec 1, 2022
@zah zah deleted the 4134-follow-up branch December 1, 2022 11:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants