-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Compare public elements of struct #1309
Merged
boyan-soubachov
merged 10 commits into
stretchr:master
from
mchlp:compare_public_elements_of_struct
Mar 14, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fee1023
Implement checking only exported fields
mchlp 0b7f0e4
Update comment
mchlp c51475b
Run go generate
mchlp e260dab
Make compatiable with Go 1.16.5
mchlp 08adb69
Fix go generate files
mchlp dd41004
Fix white space changes
mchlp a1af731
Merge branch 'compare_public_elements_of_struct' of github.com:mchlp/…
mchlp f4a663e
Fix whitespace changes
mchlp 6e8360d
Fix whitespace changes in gogenerate files
mchlp 078f454
Merge branch 'stretchr:master' into compare_public_elements_of_struct
mchlp File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤔 Given that this is the assert package, would it not make sense if we did assert?
Right now the functionality of this is more of a helper function, should we not just change it to an assert function that asserts whether
object_a
's exported fields ==object_b
's exported fields?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have another function that is added further down in the file called
EqualExportedValues
that actually does the assertion by calling thisObjectsExportedFieldsAreEqual
helper function.We thought that it would make sense to split up the logic for actually doing the comparison (and put it into a helper function) from the actual assertion function. This seems to be the approach that is used for equality comparisons with a
ObjectsAreEqual
helper function that is then called by theEqual
function that actually does the assertion.