-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document the CCE example input file #6015
Document the CCE example input file #6015
Conversation
a2eefa9
to
8b65d43
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding these details! Everything looks fine to me, but we may want to lower the constant step chooser to 0.1 for production runs (helps with ringdown studies).
StepChoosers: | ||
- Constant: 0.5 | ||
- Constant: 0.5 # Don't take steps bigger than 0.5M |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We might want to lower this to 0.1 for production runs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, I'll decrease it! We hopefully can have the tests not time out with that so then we can just have the sample not require changes for production :)
# How often per CCE time step to output. Given the tight default tolerances of | ||
# 1e-6 with an Adams-Bashforth stepper, once per time step is probably fine. | ||
ScriOutputDensity: 1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@keefemitman Is this often enough for waveform analysis? I don't have an intuition on what we need
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
1
seems to be fine for the majority of runs I've looked at
8b65d43
to
9ad853d
Compare
I've rebased and squashed changes. Thanks for the reviews! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One small thing
This is to help people like me who don't know what anything means actually be able to change things in a meaningful way.
9ad853d
to
a583b01
Compare
Whoops! Done, thanks! |
Proposed changes
This is to help people like me who don't know what anything means actually be able to change things in a meaningful way.
Upgrade instructions
Code review checklist
make doc
to generate the documentation locally intoBUILD_DIR/docs/html
.Then open
index.html
.code review guide.
bugfix
ornew feature
if appropriate.Further comments