Using worf is so much better

[CestDiego]

worf-mode gives more vi-like
key bindings for org-mode :D evil-org on the other hand shadows some
long stablished vim keybindings :) I feel you should try it. there is
not really a conf for it so maybe just try it?

THIS DELETES EVIL-ORG

[syl20bnr]

I will put a break on this and take time to think about org and spacemacs, I want it a top notch integration.

[sooheon]

After being frustrated by o and O in evil-org one too many times, I decided to try this. abo-abo is a genius, and it's a shame he doesn't completely embrace vi. Still, this is another paradigm beyond emacs or vi, and it may only be appropriate as an option, not the default (it doesn't use normal mode, but another special mode in insert mode). Once you learn it, you love it though.

[Kethku]

I think this should be a layer of its own instead of being merged directly into the org layer, that way you can choose either the org bindings as they are now or the worf bindings which take over a lot more stuff. An added benefit is that this could get merged pretty quickly since it is totally optional instead of screwing everyone's bindings which depend on org mode.

[sooheon]

I agree with making this an additional layer for all the reasons you've said, and that the layer can deal specifically with compatibility issues between the packages.

[CestDiego]

What do you think about having a layer-variable that lets the user select either evil-org or worf as the keybindings? or actually just chose none?

[CestDiego]

Ok guys, I added the variable anyway :P @geo7 this way you can "try" evil-org as well :P. Also I added the , keybindings for org into the common init-org as I think worf might benefit from it also

[robbyoconnor]

I like this -- I want this

[robbyoconnor]

👍

[CestDiego]

@TheBB we got approval of the PR police :P this shold be tagged.... To be evil *org* to be worf

[Kethku]

I too want this 👍

[Kethku]

To worf org not to worf. That is the question

[TheBB]

A bit too magical maybe? I would rather worf and evil-org are both in org-packages. You can use :if in use-package to pick which one to install, or just make the defuns conditional on the value of org-mapping-style. That way both packages still show up in SPC f e h.

[CestDiego]

I like this approach much better thanks for the feedback :)

[CestDiego]

#done :)

[robbyoconnor]

Yay!
On 08/26/2015 04:12 PM, Diego Berrocal wrote:

In contrib/org/packages.el
#1417 (comment):

@@ -22,6 +22,17 @@
toc-org
))

+(when org-mapping-style

• (push org-mapping-style org-packages))

#done :)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/syl20bnr/spacemacs/pull/1417/files#r38028998.

[CestDiego]

@syl20bnr now that we have evil-org i think this basically isn't very important?

[a13ph]

@CestDiego worf is similar, but different. It's more emacs-style, since it is a different way of doing orgmode speedkeys. You do worf things from inside insert state, but while on heading stars. Evil-org is very incomplete from what i've seen, compared to worf.
There's also syndicate and maybe also 1-2 other other implementations...

[zedeus]

Any update on this?

[TheBB]

Thanks for this ancient PR. I'll close it now because it has served its purpose. #9041