-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
S/MIME: Extracting certificate with multiple email values fails #1196
Comments
@urz-hgw , could you please show us any example of the certificate "with multiple email values"? (Sensitive information, e.g. subject and issuer of the certificate, actual emails in any attributes etc., should be masked.) |
Hi @ikedas Sure, here is the output of
The important section is at X509v3 Subject Alternative Name. Best regards |
…ubjectAltName extension in S/MIME certificates be parsed properly (sympa-community#1196)
@urz-hgw , could you please apply this patch and check if the problem will be solved (and certificate with single email will also be processed properly)? |
Hi @ikedas thanks for the immediate patch. I tested it and the problem seems to be solved. |
S/MIME: subjectAltName in certificate couldn't be parsed properly (#1196)
@urz-hgw , thank yor for confirming! This fix will be included in the next stable release, 6.2.64. |
Version
Tested with version 6.2.40
Installation method
Installed in Debian Buster using default Debian repo
Expected behavior
The signed mail should be accepted by Sympa and delivered to the list members.
Actual behavior
The mail is rejected by sympa with the following error message:
Additional information
The used mailing list only accepts signed mails. The certificate in use has multiple email values due to the fact that each user in our organization has at least one primary and one alternative email address. One of the email values does match the sender address so the verification is correct. When I remove all email aliases from the certificate except the one I use as sender for the mailing list, the mail is correctly delivered to the members.
Best regards
Daniel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: