RFQ-Indexer DB updates

[Defi-Moses]

Changes two small naming conventions for stanadardization

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Updated naming conventions for fields in the BridgeProofDisputedEvents table to enhance clarity and consistency.

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved event handling logic for FastBridgeV2 events to align with the updated field names.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the BridgeProofDisputedEvents table schema in the ponder.schema.ts file. The fields chainId and chain have been renamed to originChainId and originChain, respectively, to enhance clarity and consistency with other event tables. Additionally, the event handling logic for FastBridgeV2 events has been updated to reflect these new field names, ensuring uniformity across the codebase.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
packages/rfq-indexer/indexer/ponder.schema.ts	Renamed fields chainId to originChainId and chain to originChain in BridgeProofDisputedEvents. Updated event handling logic to reflect these changes.

Possibly related PRs

• RFQ-Indexer Adding events #3227: This PR introduces the "bridgedispute" event to the indexer, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the BridgeProofDisputedEvents table schema and event handling logic.

Suggested labels

size/m, Sol, Typescript

Suggested reviewers

• bigboydiamonds
• trajan0x
• abtestingalpha

Poem

In the schema where events do play,
chainId transformed, a bright new day.
originChainId now takes the stage,
Consistency blooms, wisdom of age.
With each little change, we hop and cheer,
For clarity's path is now crystal clear! 🐰✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61c2310 and bc3755d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• packages/rfq-indexer/indexer/ponder.schema.ts (1 hunks)
• packages/rfq-indexer/indexer/src/index.ts (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (4)

packages/rfq-indexer/indexer/ponder.schema.ts (2)

Line range hint 1-94: Summary: Naming convention standardization successfully implemented.

The changes in this file successfully standardize the naming convention for chain-related fields in the BridgeProofDisputedEvents table, aligning it with other tables in the schema. This improvement enhances code consistency and readability across the project.

---

88-89: LGTM! Consistent naming improvement.

The renaming of chainId to originChainId and chain to originChain in the BridgeProofDisputedEvents table improves consistency with other event tables in the schema. This change enhances code readability and maintainability.

To ensure these changes don't break existing code, please run the following script to check for any references to the old field names:

If the script returns any results, those occurrences should be updated to use the new field names.

packages/rfq-indexer/indexer/src/index.ts (2)

168-169: Approved: Improved naming consistency

The renaming of chainId to originChainId and chain to originChain enhances the consistency of the codebase. This change aligns the BridgeProofDisputed event handler with other handlers in the file, making it clear that these properties refer to the origin chain. Good job on standardizing the naming convention!

---

168-169: Verify impact on data consumers

While the renaming improves consistency, it's important to ensure that any code consuming data from the BridgeProofDisputedEvents table is updated to use the new property names (originChainId and originChain). Please verify that all relevant queries or data access points are adjusted accordingly to prevent any potential issues.

To help verify this, you can run the following script to search for any usage of the old property names in relation to BridgeProofDisputedEvents:

This script will search for any occurrences of BridgeProofDisputedEvents followed by chain (but not chainId or chainChain) in TypeScript and JavaScript files, excluding the current file. If there are any results, those areas may need to be updated.

✅ Verification successful

No external usages of old property names found

All consumers of the BridgeProofDisputedEvents table are using the updated property names (originChainId and originChain). No adjustments are necessary.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential usage of old property names
rg --type typescript --type javascript 'BridgeProofDisputedEvents.*chain(?!Id|Chain)' -g '!**/index.ts'

Length of output: 385

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential usage of old property names using PCRE2 for look-around
rg --pcre2 --type typescript --type javascript 'BridgeProofDisputedEvents.*chain(?!Id|Chain)' -g '!**/index.ts'

Length of output: 148

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential usage of old property names using file extensions and PCRE2
rg --pcre2 'BridgeProofDisputedEvents.*chain(?!Id|Chain)' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx' -g '!**/index.ts'

Length of output: 119

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying sanguine-fe with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	bc3755d
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://1fd7941a.sanguine-fe.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://feat-rfq-indexer-db-names.sanguine-fe.pages.dev

View logs

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.43902%. Comparing base (61c2310) to head (bc3755d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##              master       #3239         +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage   90.24584%   90.43902%   +0.19317%     
===================================================
  Files             60          54          -6     
  Lines           1261        1025        -236     
  Branches         150          82         -68     
===================================================
- Hits            1138         927        -211     
+ Misses           118          95         -23     
+ Partials           5           3          -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
packages	90.43902% <ø> (ø)
solidity	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.