Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust recent vuln cache #246

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024
Merged

Adjust recent vuln cache #246

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

synfinner
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@synfinner synfinner self-assigned this Dec 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request primarily involve modifications to the schema/api.py file, focusing on the caching mechanism and error handling for the RecentVulnerabilitiesByDaysResource class. The caching timeout for the fetch_vulnerabilities method has been reduced from 30 minutes to 10 minutes. Additionally, the error handling in the get method has been enhanced to validate the days parameter more rigorously, ensuring it is provided and is a non-negative integer.

Changes

File Change Summary
schema/api.py - Reduced caching timeout in fetch_vulnerabilities from 30 minutes to 10 minutes.
- Enhanced error handling in get method of RecentVulnerabilitiesByDaysResource to validate days parameter.

Poem

In the garden where bunnies play,
Changes hop in, brightening the day.
Caching's quicker, errors now clear,
With each little tweak, we cheer and we cheer!
So let's dance and twirl, oh what a delight,
For every small change makes our code just right! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

schema/api.py Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
schema/api.py (1)

420-420: Consider adding cache hit rate monitoring.

To ensure the reduced cache timeout doesn't adversely affect performance, consider adding monitoring for cache hit rates and response times.

Example metrics to track:

  • Cache hit/miss rates
  • Average response time for cached vs. uncached requests
  • Cache memory usage
  • Database load during cache misses
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd7ac1c and 96a4747.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • schema/api.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
schema/api.py (1)

420-420: LGTM! Verify cache performance impact.

The reduction in cache timeout from 30 minutes to 10 minutes is reasonable for security-critical data. However, let's verify that this change doesn't significantly impact system performance.

✅ Verification successful

Cache timeout change aligns with existing patterns

The reduced cache timeout (600s) for vulnerability data is consistent with the codebase's caching strategy:

  • Static content (privacy, about, donate) uses longer timeouts (3600s)
  • Security-critical endpoints use shorter timeouts (10-15s for OpenAI routes, CVE existence checks)
  • Similar data endpoints use comparable timeouts (60s for KEVs, 120s for document counts)

The change strikes a good balance between data freshness and system performance, falling within the established patterns.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other cache timeouts in the codebase to ensure consistency
# and identify potential performance impact areas.

echo "Searching for cache timeout configurations..."
rg -A 2 "@cache\(" 

echo "Searching for cache-related monitoring or metrics..."
rg -l "cache.*metrics|metrics.*cache"

Length of output: 3024

@synfinner synfinner merged commit 2a11eed into main Dec 4, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant