-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adjust recent vuln cache #246
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in the pull request primarily involve modifications to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
schema/api.py (1)
420-420
: Consider adding cache hit rate monitoring.To ensure the reduced cache timeout doesn't adversely affect performance, consider adding monitoring for cache hit rates and response times.
Example metrics to track:
- Cache hit/miss rates
- Average response time for cached vs. uncached requests
- Cache memory usage
- Database load during cache misses
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
schema/api.py
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
schema/api.py (1)
420-420
: LGTM! Verify cache performance impact.
The reduction in cache timeout from 30 minutes to 10 minutes is reasonable for security-critical data. However, let's verify that this change doesn't significantly impact system performance.
✅ Verification successful
Cache timeout change aligns with existing patterns
The reduced cache timeout (600s) for vulnerability data is consistent with the codebase's caching strategy:
- Static content (privacy, about, donate) uses longer timeouts (3600s)
- Security-critical endpoints use shorter timeouts (10-15s for OpenAI routes, CVE existence checks)
- Similar data endpoints use comparable timeouts (60s for KEVs, 120s for document counts)
The change strikes a good balance between data freshness and system performance, falling within the established patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other cache timeouts in the codebase to ensure consistency
# and identify potential performance impact areas.
echo "Searching for cache timeout configurations..."
rg -A 2 "@cache\("
echo "Searching for cache-related monitoring or metrics..."
rg -l "cache.*metrics|metrics.*cache"
Length of output: 3024
No description provided.