feat: support bools in DataType.as_f64 and DataType.as_i64 variants #399
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Luka Peschke <luka.peschke@toucantoco.com>
Signed-off-by: Luka Peschke <luka.peschke@toucantoco.com>
|
Thanks, I think it is reasonable yes. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello @tafia , I figured it would be nice to have an implicit conversion from bool to i64/f64 when using
as_{i64,f64}, do you believe this makes sense as well ?I haven't modified
as_stringyet because I thought it'd maybe be unexpected behaviour, but I'd gladly add if as well if you believe it makes sense 🙂