fix(202-tariscript): add missing OP_CHECKMULTISIG/VERIFY and update error codes #15
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
stringhandler
pushed a commit
to tari-project/tari
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2022
Description --- - Adds ToRistrettoPoint opcodes - Added scalar stack item Motivation and Context --- As per RFC-202 Ref tari-project/rfcs#15 Ref #4742 How Has This Been Tested? --- Additional unit tests + tests updated
|
+1. Just add a |
sdbondi
force-pushed
the
rfc-202-update
branch
from
23258b3 to
3981f0b
Compare
|
Why is this controversial @stringhandler? |
CjS77
approved these changes
Oct 13, 2022
stringhandler
approved these changes
Oct 13, 2022
CjS77
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2022
…rror codes (#15) * fix(202-tariscript): add missing OP_CHECKMULTISIG/VERIFY and update error codes * add changelog
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Motivation and Context
Reconcile implementation and RFC differences