Added discover-peer command
#1544
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sdbondi
force-pushed
the
sb-discover-peer-cmd
branch
from
b282afd to
ca433e5
Compare
``` >> discover-peer c85bb4933d2e9e9e924e47530c00b987072da14c3a2a36b86e20cfxxxxxxxx 🌎 Peer discovery started. ⚡️ Discovery succeeded in 1293ms! This peer was found: [ac414ecc153977fa] PK=c85bb4933d2e9e9e924e47530c00b987072da14c3a2a36b86exxxxxxxxxxx /onion3/[redacted]:18021 "WALLET" Last connected at '2020-03-20 15:14:01.734128'. ```
sdbondi
force-pushed
the
sb-discover-peer-cmd
branch
from
ca433e5 to
a041fb3
Compare
4 tasks
SWvheerden
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2024
Description --- Added dynamic growth size to LMBD, where it will grow with the configured size as well an optional shortfall size that could not be written. This is especially relevant during block sync of many full blocks where the output SMT has grown very large. Motivation and Context --- Block sync did not work with many full blocks. ```rust 2024-03-25 07:27:14.304496100 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 5 time(s) in this transaction) 2024-03-25 07:27:14.317099900 [lmdb] DEBUG (\node_05\esmeralda\data/base_node\db) LMDB MB, mapsize was grown from 1616 MB to 1632 MB, increased by 16 MB 2024-03-25 07:27:14.319843700 [c::bn::block_sync] WARN Chain storage error: DB transaction was too large (3 operations) 2024-03-25 07:27:14.319864400 [c::bn::block_sync] WARN Block sync failed: No more sync peers available: Block sync failed 2024-03-25 07:27:14.319969400 [c::cs::database] INFO Rewinding headers from height 6325 to 1627 ``` How Has This Been Tested? --- System-level archival sync-from-scratch test on esmeralda after a coin-split and transaction stress test. Before the fix, blocks #1544 to #1584. Multiple resizes for the same set of write operations was required, with the final one resulting in block sync failure. ```rust 2024-03-25 07:19:35.346281600 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 1 time(s) in this transaction) 2024-03-25 07:19:35.654103900 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 2 time(s) in this transaction) 2024-03-25 07:19:35.952783600 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 3 time(s) in this transaction) 2024-03-25 07:19:41.198100900 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 1 time(s) in this transaction) 2024-03-25 07:19:41.519953900 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 2 time(s) in this transaction) 2024-03-25 07:19:41.827079500 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 3 time(s) in this transaction) 2024-03-25 07:19:42.136522700 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 4 time(s) in this transaction) 2024-03-25 07:20:29.331297000 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 1 time(s) in this transaction) 2024-03-25 07:20:29.755442600 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 2 time(s) in this transaction) 2024-03-25 07:20:30.119457000 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 3 time(s) in this transaction) 2024-03-25 07:20:30.491588200 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 4 time(s) in this transaction) 2024-03-25 07:20:30.868365300 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 5 time(s) in this transaction) ``` After the fix, blocks #1544 to #1584. Only a single resize each time for a set of write operations was required. ```rust 2024-03-25 16:40:28.814566400 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 1 time(s) in this transaction) 2024-03-25 16:42:05.167759000 [c::cs::lmdb_db::lmdb_db] INFO Database resize required (resized 1 time(s) in this transaction) ``` What process can a PR reviewer use to test or verify this change? --- Code review <!-- Checklist --> <!-- 1. Is the title of your PR in the form that would make nice release notes? The title, excluding the conventional commit tag, will be included exactly as is in the CHANGELOG, so please think about it carefully. --> Breaking Changes --- - [x] None - [ ] Requires data directory on base node to be deleted - [ ] Requires hard fork - [ ] Other - Please specify <!-- Does this include a breaking change? If so, include this line as a footer --> <!-- BREAKING CHANGE: Description what the user should do, e.g. delete a database, resync the chain -->
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
discover-peer [emoji id]workslist-peersalso lists wallets.list-peers basenodelists base nodes only (list-peers bnfor short)list-peers walletlists wallets only (list-peers wfor short)