fix: use range proof batch splitting #5081
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
AaronFeickert
force-pushed
the
range-proof-api
branch
from
61782be to
5b994f7
Compare
AaronFeickert
force-pushed
the
range-proof-api
branch
from
1052672 to
61000c4
Compare
stringhandler
approved these changes
Jan 4, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Updates
tari-cryptodependencies to use range proof batch splitting.Motivation and Context
An earlier PR removed an unnecessary restriction on range proof batch splitting. Recent
bulletproofs-pluswork updates range proof batching to split large batches for performance reasons, and also updates the verification API for clarity. A corresponding PR intari-cryptouses this new API, but does not change its own external range proof verification API.This PR updates
tari-cryptodependencies to take advantage of this new functionality.How Has This Been Tested?
Existing tests pass.