Replace aambiguous = sign by : in rules

[barbudor]

Hi @blakadder
Following this mis-interpretation in arendst/Tasmota#20251 I suggest to use : instead of `=è to separate the token from the explanation.
Done htat for Rules commands here
Can slowly start to apply to other blocks later on

Agreed ?

[blakadder]

So you're changing one character with another so people can now use : as part of their misinterpreted syntax?

[barbudor]

Ples adding a couple of extended exemples

I think that in the contect of Mem/Var, = is more ambiguous than : as they may be used with = in programming language.
And in general I feel : stands better to be followed by an explanation than =

[blakadder]

= was there from inception of the wiki. Changing it to insignificantly reduce ambiguity is not a preferred outcome, Either remove ambiguity completely or leave it be. You will always have individuals skipping the intro on how to use commands