Editorial: fix number types in Array.prototype.findIndex / RegExp.pro…

…totype[Symbol.search]

spec.html

@@ -32413,7 +32413,7 @@ <h1>RegExp.prototype [ @@search ] ( _string_ )</h1>
           1. Let _currentLastIndex_ be ? Get(_rx_, *"lastIndex"*).
           1. If SameValue(_currentLastIndex_, _previousLastIndex_) is *false*, then
             1. Perform ? Set(_rx_, *"lastIndex"*, _previousLastIndex_, *true*).
-          1. If _result_ is *null*, return -1.
+          1. If _result_ is *null*, return *-1*<sub>𝔽</sub>.
           1. Return ? Get(_result_, *"index"*).
         </emu-alg>
         <p>The value of the *"name"* property of this function is *"[Symbol.search]"*.</p>
@@ -33127,9 +33127,9 @@ <h1>Array.prototype.findIndex ( _predicate_ [ , _thisArg_ ] )</h1>
             1. Let _Pk_ be ! ToString(𝔽(_k_)).
             1. Let _kValue_ be ? Get(_O_, _Pk_).
             1. Let _testResult_ be ! ToBoolean(? Call(_predicate_, _thisArg_, &laquo; _kValue_, 𝔽(_k_), _O_ &raquo;)).
-            1. If _testResult_ is *true*, return _k_.
+            1. If _testResult_ is *true*, return 𝔽(_k_).
             1. Set _k_ to _k_ + 1.
-          1. Return -1.
+          1. Return *-1*<sub>𝔽</sub>.
         </emu-alg>
         <emu-note>
           <p>The `findIndex` function is intentionally generic; it does not require that its *this* value be an Array object. Therefore it can be transferred to other kinds of objects for use as a method.</p>