-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validate PullRequest resource secrets fields #2378
Validate PullRequest resource secrets fields #2378
Conversation
Hi @adshmh. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a tektoncd member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@@ -132,3 +139,15 @@ func validateURL(u, path string) *apis.FieldError { | |||
} | |||
return nil | |||
} | |||
|
|||
func validatePullRequest(s *PipelineResourceSpec) *apis.FieldError { | |||
if s.Type != PipelineResourceTypePullRequest { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We're doing this check twice, once on line 107 and again here. Suggest removing this one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the review. Fixed.
/ok-to-test |
The following is the coverage report on pkg/.
|
A PullRequest type pipeline resource is now validated: an unrecognised 'fieldName' in secrets will trigger an error. Part of work on tektoncd#1818 As stated in tektoncd#1818, this will help improve the debuggability of the PullRequst pipeline resource, as the validatiob will cause a failure in response to invalid input as early as possible. Signed-off-by: Arash Deshmeh <adeshmeh@ca.ibm.com>
e08c92c
to
9fca352
Compare
The following is the coverage report on pkg/.
|
/retest |
Failing tests changed without any code changes. Look like a flake. Trying one more time. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sbwsg, vdemeester The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Changes
A PullRequest type pipeline resource is now validated: an unrecognised
'fieldName' in secrets will trigger an error.
As stated in #1818, this will help improve the debuggability of the
PullRequst pipeline resource, as the validatiob will cause a failure in
response to invalid input as early as possible.
Submitter Checklist
These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:
See the contribution guide for more details.
Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:
cmd
dir, please updatethe release Task to build and release this image.
Reviewer Notes
If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.
Release Notes