Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relax result type validation to avoid nightly build failure #5068

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2022

Conversation

afrittoli
Copy link
Member

Changes

Cherry-picked from #5043

This commit fixes the string result type validation, PR #4779 adds
result type and asumes that the default type should be string via
mutating webhook. PR #4818 adds the validation for this. However,
resources that did already exist in etcd didn't get the default. So this
commit relaxes the validation for empty result type.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Frittoli andrea.frittoli@uk.ibm.com

/kind bug

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Docs included if any changes are user facing
  • Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including
    functionality, content, code)
  • Release notes block below has been filled in
    (if there are no user facing changes, use release note "NONE")

Release Notes

Relax the validation of result type: allow for no type specified to support resources created before result types were introduced.

This commit fixes the string result type validation, PR tektoncd#4779 adds
result type and asumes that the default type should be string via
mutating webhook. PR tektoncd#4818 adds the validation for this. However,
resources that did already exist in etcd didn't get the default. So this
commit relaxes the validation for empty result type.
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. labels Jul 4, 2022
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 4, 2022
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vdemeester

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 4, 2022
@abayer
Copy link
Contributor

abayer commented Jul 4, 2022

/retest
/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 4, 2022
@abayer
Copy link
Contributor

abayer commented Jul 4, 2022

@afrittoli Ok, this failure actually looks legit...I'm not sure why it's failing, though.

@afrittoli
Copy link
Member Author

TestTaskRetry? uh?

@afrittoli
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/retest

@afrittoli
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

Copy link
Member

@jerop jerop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/retest

@abayer
Copy link
Contributor

abayer commented Jul 21, 2022

/retest

@afrittoli We still need this, right?

@abayer
Copy link
Contributor

abayer commented Jul 21, 2022

Ah, right, this also needs #5148

@abayer
Copy link
Contributor

abayer commented Jul 21, 2022

/retest

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit a59ccb5 into tektoncd:release-v0.36.x Jul 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants