Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Example Pydantic support #1009

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 19, 2023
Merged

Example Pydantic support #1009

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 19, 2023

Conversation

tfranzel
Copy link
Owner

@tfranzel tfranzel commented Jun 19, 2023

…tensions #1006

In rare cases, extensions may target non-std classes like Pydantic
classes. Changed lines cannot be circumvented by an extension and
thus always provoke an exception in case of non-std classes.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 50.00% and project coverage change: -0.03 ⚠️

Comparison is base (dee630c) 98.59% compared to head (9bae4f0) 98.56%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1009      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.59%   98.56%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          68       68              
  Lines        8313     8316       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         8196     8197       +1     
- Misses        117      119       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
drf_spectacular/plumbing.py 97.05% <50.00%> (-0.25%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@tfranzel tfranzel merged commit ae52f23 into master Jun 19, 2023
@tfranzel tfranzel deleted the pydantic_blockers branch June 19, 2023 21:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant