Enhancement (docker): Add more archs

[leojonathanoh]

The build succeeded, see leojonathanoh#2.

docker pull ghcr.io/leojonathanoh/snappymail:pr-2-0d9c2a8
docker pull leojonathanoh/snappymail:pr-2-0d9c2a8

[the-djmaze]

Should we really add ARMv6 and ARMv7?
Besides that they are old... They are 32bit and that can have conflicts, because IMAP uses 64bit numbers (don't work in PHP 32bit).

[leojonathanoh]

Agreed. They are taking super long to build, over an hour. So, only arm64?

[leojonathanoh]

worth adding linux/s390x?

[the-djmaze]

worth adding linux/s390x?

When people start using 64bit mainframes and docker. They will also probably ask to support MAILBOX-REFERRALS (RFC 2193, 5258) 😆
As:

A001 DELETE "SHARED/FOO"
A001 NO [REFERRAL IMAP://user;AUTH=*@SERVER2/SHARED/FOO] Remote mailbox. Try SERVER2.

[leojonathanoh]

don't really know what that means 😕 you mean that's only supported on 390x?

[the-djmaze]

don't really know what that means 😕

IMAP can be setup to have "remote" mailboxes.
Say your enterprise server/mainframe is full/overloaded and you moved half of the mailboxes to a different server.
Then IMAP can tell the client (SnappyMail) that some are \Remote and then we need RLIST or RLSUB commands to list them or the LIST-EXTENDED REMOTE.

With 390x i think we are more in the boat to implement this IMAP feature then with normal docker instances.

[leojonathanoh]

i see, shouldn't this be a IMAP protocol specific implementation? for it to be specific to an arch is strange.

[the-djmaze]

It is IMAP protocol specific. But i wonder if we should support 390x

[leojonathanoh]

yeah. but so long as the builds / tests succeed, it is assumed that 390x should work just as any arch would. It's not very used much in the wild anyway 🥲

[leojonathanoh]

guess we could drop it? your take i guess 😄

[the-djmaze]

It's not very used much in the wild anyway 🥲

Then skip it. Arm64 will be enough then.
Pretty useless to wait longer for archs that are hardly used.

[the-djmaze]

I will keep in mind to drop linux/386 within a few years as well.

#830

[the-djmaze]

Error: Input does not meet YAML 1.2 "Core Schema" specification: push
Support boolean input list: `true | True | TRUE | false | False | FALSE`

[leojonathanoh]

Let me rebase

[leojonathanoh]

where are you seeing the yaml error?

[the-djmaze]

at docker build

[leojonathanoh]

see it, second

[leojonathanoh]

39 mins for cacheless builds, guess that's fine? but there's docker caching in the CI, so if it hits the cache, it will be much faster. Which, should be most of the time.