-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 133
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ASoC: SOF: pm: check if core is powered up before performing resume s… #473
Conversation
…equence There are some corner cases that the pm suspend callback could fail and the DSP is not powered off. If this happens, we should skip performing the actions in the resume callback to avoid any DSP panic. Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
doesn't build and not sure if this is the right place for such hacks.
* DSP panic. So check if core 0 is powered off to make | ||
* sure before proceeding further. | ||
*/ | ||
if (snd_sof_dsp_core_is_enabled(sdev, BIT(0)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is starting to look like a hardware-dependent work-around in the framework. Can it be moved to the hardware or abstracted away?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@plbossart sure. let me try to move it around. But I also feel like we are trying to hide the real issue with this hack. I am having second thoughts about it.
@plbossart i'm closing this one as it not an elegant solution and this is just going allow us to sweep the dust under the carpet. |
We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module. And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following: [ 34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8 [ 34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 5.4.0-rc3+ #473 [ 34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0 [ 34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 34.644545] Call Trace: [ 34.644907] scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0 [ 34.645511] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.646046] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.646559] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.647041] scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40 [ 34.647652] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.648186] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.648691] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.649157] scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360 [ 34.649953] execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80 [ 34.650603] scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30 [ 34.651221] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.651732] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.652230] sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50 [ 34.652935] sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f [ 34.653579] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40 [ 34.654103] sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60 [ 34.654603] kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250 [ 34.655165] __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60 [ 34.655639] vfs_write+0xc7/0x280 [ 34.656117] ksys_write+0x6d/0x140 [ 34.656591] __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30 [ 34.657114] do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400 [ 34.657627] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130 During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then, sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON. To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
…equence
There are some corner cases that the pm suspend callback could
fail and the DSP is not powered off. If this happens, we
should skip performing the actions in the resume callback
to avoid any DSP panic.
Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com