[STABLE-v2.2] Update rimage to version 02abc5d342a3, including critical openssl3 fix

[marc-hb]

Fixes #9340

This adds the following commits from the main rimage branch:

commit 02abc5d342a3 ("rimage: ace signing functions need openssl 3.0 guards")
commit 73a9d7c897d3 ("rimage: fix openssl 3.0 support in ver25 signing")
commit 8ba3d1729656 ("adsp_config: fix name parsing error in parse_signed_pkg_ace_v1_5")
commit fe4dcaa62c13 ("mtl: Add ASRC module to the manifest")
commit af947cb63dd6 ("config: Add toml config for mtl")
commit c484d99abf89 ("rimage:  add ACE V1.5 handling")
commit 1b233f68bdee ("config: add rmb toml file to support rembrandt build")

This is the smallest main branch fast-forward that includes the critical openssl3 fix commit 73a9d7c ("rimage: fix openssl 3.0 support in ver25 signing") and compiles.

This happens to align the rimage version in stable-v2.2 to the version in stable-v2.3. stable-v2.3 is not in use anymore but it was routinely tested in CI for a long time. In fact this stable-v2.2 commit is the same as stable-v2.3 commit 4e1d3ba ("rimage: update to version 02abc5d")

[marc-hb]

https://sof-ci.01.org/sofpr/PR9342/build6806/devicetest/index.html all green.

[plbossart]

stable-2.2 should not have any support for ACE and MTL, I am confused here?

[marc-hb]

stable-2.2 should not have any support for ACE and MTL, I am confused here?

Indeed not: here I'm trying NOT to create a new rimage branch and avoid cherry-picks to keep things simple. So this is just the smallest possible fast-forward on the old rimage main branch. This happens to pick up a couple irrelevant and harmless commits along the way.

[plbossart]

stable-2.2 should not have any support for ACE and MTL, I am confused here?

Indeed not: here I'm trying NOT to create a new rimage branch and avoid cherry-picks to keep things simple. So this is just the smallest possible fast-forward on the old rimage main branch. This happens to pick up a couple irrelevant and harmless commits along the way.

ah ok, i thought those were cherry-picked. Thanks for the explanation.

[brentlu]

The test result is promising. FW download success and HDA/DP playback and DMIC record also work.

=> current stable-v2.2
[ 7.692364] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: hda_cl_copy_fw: timeout with rom_status_reg (0x80000) read
[ 7.692775] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: ------------[ DSP dump start ]------------
[ 7.692778] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: Firmware download failed
[ 7.692779] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: fw_state: SOF_FW_BOOT_IN_PROGRESS (3)
[ 7.692794] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: 0x80000012: module: ROM, state: CSE_VALIDATE_IMAGE_REQUEST, not running
[ 7.692811] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: error code: 0x2c (error: signature verification failed)
[ 7.692828] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: extended rom status: 0x80000012 0x2c 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x256053e 0x0
[ 7.692830] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: ------------[ DSP dump end ]------------
[ 7.692912] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: Failed to start DSP
[ 7.692914] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: error: failed to boot DSP firmware -110
[ 7.743630] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: error: hda_dsp_core_reset_enter: timeout on HDA_DSP_REG_ADSPCS read
[ 7.743636] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: error: dsp core reset failed: core_mask 1
[ 8.380548] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: error: sof_probe_work failed err: -110

=> after patched:
[ 4.730057] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: Firmware info: version 2:2:10-159b6
[ 4.730065] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: Firmware: ABI 3:23:0 Kernel ABI 3:23:0
[ 4.730070] sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: Firmware debug build 65535 on dtermin.-extman - options: