Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Defined process for handling misscrambles #1266
base: draft
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Defined process for handling misscrambles #1266
Changes from 17 commits
f5e8f31
387ca6c
1f88e5d
be2f219
4e2bbb2
e928d5e
e0120b4
11f711d
f80a27d
a4c726a
3019658
6d70bdd
dba4d72
97429c5
0f873c5
5fca8ae
86943fc
546d0d2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This wording is very confusing. My recommendation is to split single and average into 2 seperate regulations:
It's an extra regulation with a lot of overlap, however it is significantly easier to comprehend the regulations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding onto this, although I am not as concerned about the wording as Jacob is, what is the base reference for the Top 50 rankings?
Consider the following example:
At the time of the average, it placed WR50. However, it is now WR51. Would an extra attempt be required to be given to Competitor A since their result would have been WR50 at the time of the average? Or should the misscramble be allowed to stand since the result is now out of the top 50?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like Jacob's wording better than the current wording. I would even change the proposed 11i1b) to something like this:
11i1b) The result is part of an average or mean that is a regional record or a personal record in the top 50 results of the world rankings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are at least two ambiguities (I posted this on wca forums as well):