Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Defined process for handling misscrambles #1266

Open
wants to merge 18 commits into
base: draft
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 17 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions wca-guidelines.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ To be more informative, each Guideline is classified using one of the following
- 4d++) [ADDITION] It is permitted for the puzzle to change its orientation when it is moved from the scrambler to the solving station, as long as no one is attempting to influence the randomness of the orientation (see [Regulation A2e1](regulations:regulation:A2e1)).
- 4f+) [RECOMMENDATION] The WCA Delegate should generate sufficient scramble sequences for the entire competition ahead of time, including spare scramble sequences for extra attempts.
- 4f++) [REMINDER] If the WCA Delegate generates any additional scramble sequences during the competition, the scramble sequences must be saved.
- 4g+) [RECOMMENTATION] After verifying the puzzle is scrambled correctly, the scrambler may pass the puzzle to another scrambler to verify as well. In this case, only one of the scramblers is required to sign the scorecard.
CarterKoala marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
- 4g1b+) [CLARIFICATION] For 5x5x5 Blindfolded, incorrect puzzle states must always be corrected.
- 4g1b++) [RECOMMENDATION] The WCA Delegate should use stronger discretion when determining whether or not incorrect puzzle states for 5x5x5 Cube need to be corrected.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -159,6 +160,9 @@ To be more informative, each Guideline is classified using one of the following
- 11e1+) [REMINDER] The extra attempt must be scrambled using an unmodified scramble sequence generated by an official scramble program (see [Regulation 4f](regulations:regulation:4f), [Guideline 4f+](guidelines:guideline:4f+)).
- 11e2+) [ADDITION] If an extra attempt itself leads to an additional extra attempt, the competitor should keep doing extra attempts until there is a valid extra attempt to replace the original regularly numbered attempt.
- 11e2++) [EXAMPLE] Suppose a competitor has 5 regularly numbered attempts, and #2 leads to extra attempts. The competitor should do extra attempts until there is a valid extra attempt to replace #2. Suppose later another attempt leads to extra attempts, the competitor should proceed in a similar way as for #2.
- 11i1+) [RECOMMENDATION] Competitors expected to meet these criteria should have their scrambles checked by a second scrambler before being sent out (see [Guideline 4g+](guidelines:guideline:4g+)).
- 11i2+) [RECOMMENDATION] If the WCA Delegate is unsure whether or not the incorrect scramble is significantly easier than the original scramble, a provisional extra attempt should be granted.
- 11j3+) [REMINDER] The scramble sequence used for the extra attempt must not be obtained from a previous group.


## <article-12><notation><notation> Article 12: Notation
Expand Down
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions wca-regulations.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -328,6 +328,18 @@ Note: Because Article and Regulation numbers are not reassigned when Regulations
- 11f) Decisions about an incident may be supported with video or photographic analysis, at the discretion of the WCA Delegate.
- 11g) The WCA Delegate must ensure that copies of the Regulations and Guidelines are available (e.g. printed, digital, or accessible via internet) to officials and competitors for consultation on any incidents.
- 11h) A WCA Delegate may require competitors in serious violation of [Regulation 2k3](regulations:regulation:2k3) to leave the competition venue, taking into account the seriousness of the situation and the best possible course of action. If the competitor refuses to do so, they may face disciplinary action in the WCA.
- 11i) If it is found that a competitor's puzzle was not scrambled correctly after they have completed their solve, the following regulations apply:
- 11i1) In the following cases, an extra attempt must be granted to replace the affected attempt. If no extra attempt is granted, the result will be considered DNS:
- 11i1a) The individual result, or the average or mean the result is part of, is a regional record or a personal record in the top 50 results of the world ranking.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This wording is very confusing. My recommendation is to split single and average into 2 seperate regulations:

  • 11i1a) The individual result is a regional record or a personal record in the top 50 results of the world rankings.
  • 11i1b) The average or mean the result is a part of is a regional record or a personal record in the top 50 results of the world rankings.

It's an extra regulation with a lot of overlap, however it is significantly easier to comprehend the regulations.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding onto this, although I am not as concerned about the wording as Jacob is, what is the base reference for the Top 50 rankings?

Consider the following example:

  • The current WR50 Clock average is 3.79 seconds (held by several people, but the top result is WR50).
  • The current WR49 Clock average is 3.77 seconds.
  • During the first group of Clock at a competition, Competitor A achieves a 3.78 second average, which is now WR50.
  • During the next group at the same competition, Competitor B achieves a 3.77 second average (tying WR49, so Competitor A is now WR51).
  • After the round (but still during the competition), Competitor A notices a misscramble from their earlier 3.78 average.

At the time of the average, it placed WR50. However, it is now WR51. Would an extra attempt be required to be given to Competitor A since their result would have been WR50 at the time of the average? Or should the misscramble be allowed to stand since the result is now out of the top 50?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like Jacob's wording better than the current wording. I would even change the proposed 11i1b) to something like this:

11i1b) The result is part of an average or mean that is a regional record or a personal record in the top 50 results of the world rankings.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are at least two ambiguities (I posted this on wca forums as well):

  1. What if a result is determined to not fall under the criteria for an extra at the competition due to a recent result, and the recent result later gets disqualified (eg. also due to a misscramble)?
  2. What happens when an average contains two misscrambles? Should only the faster be disqualified if disqualifying it prevents the result from being top 50/NR?

- 11i1b) The result is achieved in a final round of a National Championship, Continental Championship or World Championship.
- 11i1c) The result was achieved by solving the puzzle in fewer moves than the limits defined in [Regulation 4b3](regulations:regulation:4b3).
- 11i1d) Exception: For 5x5x5 Cube, 6x6x6 Cube, 7x7x7 Cube, Megaminx, and 3x3x3 Multi-Blind, an extra attempt is not necessary to be granted under the circumstances described above.
- 11i2) For all other cases, the result may stand. Exception: the WCA Delegate may grant an extra attempt at their discretion if they believe this provides a significantly fairer outcome (e.g. the incorrect scramble received was extremely easy and the competitor achieved a new personal record, the incorrect scramble impacted the podium for an event, or the puzzle was deliberately scrambled incorrectly).
- 11j) If a competitor incorrectly receives a scramble that they have already received (i.e. a duplicate scramble), the following regulations apply:
- 11j1) If the competitor believes they received a duplicate scramble in inspection, they should stop their attempt and call over a WCA Delegate without applying any moves to the puzzle. A competitor should not be penalized for incorrectly reporting a duplicate scramble genuinely, at the discretion of the WCA Delegate.
- 11j2) If the error is noticed during the group, the WCA Delegate should make an effort to give the competitor the correct scramble. An extra attempt may be given if the WCA Delegate is not certain what the correct scramble should be.
- 11j3) If the error is noticed during the competition but after the group, the missing attempt must be replaced with an extra attempt.
- 11j4) If the error is only noticed after the competition, the result will be considered DNS.


## <article-12><notation><notation> Article 12: Notation
Expand Down
Loading