Enhance deleting grace Period contracts UX #487
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
0oM4R
requested review from
AhmedHanafy725,
zaelgohary,
maayarosama,
MohamedElmdary,
Mahmoud-Emad,
amiraabouhadid and
Omarabdul3ziz
as code owners
Mahmoud-Emad
reviewed
Jun 7, 2023
Mahmoud-Emad
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
In case the user only has 0.01 tft the contract will go on with the deleting process, but will stuck while deleting its keys, and then it needs to reload the page, now this case is handled if it fails while deleting some keys will show an error message.
Changes
signAndSendfunction in_applyExtrinsicscreen record
Screencast.from.2023-06-06.16-41-08.webm
Related Issues
GracPeriodis not handled correctly #463Checklist