Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add job deploying contracts from
dapp-development
branch #119Add job deploying contracts from
dapp-development
branch #119Changes from 3 commits
bb47f4f
7f47454
4a8a541
44b31b7
d6e24c5
7ab44fa
0e4e226
944d392
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm wondering whether common parts of
contracts-deployment-testnet
andcontracts-dapp-development-deployment-testnet
could be extracted to a reusable workflow or action. But this is something that could be handled in a follow-up PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Definitely something we could do! There's more places in our workflows where using custom actions or reusable workflows could be useful. Let's not wait for these improvements to not postpone the merge. I will refactor the workflow in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wondered whether to use explicit value (
dapp-development
) here, or${{ github.event.inputs.upstream_ref }}
. Decided to use the former - it gives us less flexibility, but the general intention is that we always want to run the downstream modules on the samedapp-development
branch. And by hardcoding it, we avoid the nasty consequences of the situation when somebody triggers the workflow fromdapp-development
branch, but withupstream_ref
set to a different branch (which, if not for the harcoded value, would result in triggering of a downstream workflow from that different branch, resulting in publishing ofgoerli
-tagged package that uses modified contracts in it's dependencies) .