Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/interpreter/assign route action #1453

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024

Conversation

yamacir-kit
Copy link
Collaborator

@yamacir-kit yamacir-kit commented Nov 15, 2024

Description

Abstract

Fixed an issue where AssignRouteAction could not be applied multiple times to a Vehicle entity controlled by Autoware.

Background

#1369 introduced a feature that allows AcquirePositionAction to be applied multiple times to Vehicle entities controlled by Autoware. At that time, an equivalent feature should have been introduced for AssignRouteAction as well as AcquirePositionAction, but this was overlooked. This pull request fixes that.

Details

Note that FollowTrajectoryAction belongs to RoutingAction, just like AcquirePositionAction and AssignRouteAction, but there is no need to introduce an equivalent feature. This is because FollowTrajectoryAction for Vehicle entities controlled by Autoware is a special operation that means overriding the control of the vehicle by a controller that is not Autoware (mainly a human).

References

None.

Destructive Changes

None.

Known Limitations

None.

Signed-off-by: yamacir-kit <httperror@404-notfound.jp>
Signed-off-by: yamacir-kit <httperror@404-notfound.jp>
@yamacir-kit yamacir-kit self-assigned this Nov 15, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Checklist for reviewers ☑️

All references to "You" in the following text refer to the code reviewer.

  • Is this pull request written in a way that is easy to read from a third-party perspective?
  • Is there sufficient information (background, purpose, specification, algorithm description, list of disruptive changes, and migration guide) in the description of this pull request?
  • If this pull request contains a destructive change, does this pull request contain the migration guide?
  • Labels of this pull request are valid?
  • All unit tests/integration tests are included in this pull request? If you think adding test cases is unnecessary, please describe why and cross out this line.
  • The documentation for this pull request is enough? If you think adding documents for this pull request is unnecessary, please describe why and cross out this line.

@yamacir-kit yamacir-kit added bug Something isn't working bump patch If this pull request merged, bump patch version of the scenario_simulator_v2 wait for regression test labels Nov 15, 2024
@yamacir-kit yamacir-kit requested a review from HansRobo November 18, 2024 07:16
@yamacir-kit yamacir-kit marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2024 07:16
@yamacir-kit yamacir-kit merged commit d75dc49 into master Nov 18, 2024
15 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the fix/interpreter/assign-route-action branch November 18, 2024 09:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working bump patch If this pull request merged, bump patch version of the scenario_simulator_v2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants