You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In GAE, the decoder is trying to reconstruct the adjacency matrix. I presume that this approach makes the GVAE completely transductive because an unseen node will not be present in the adjacency matrix during training and we cannot dynamically change the dimensions of the matrix either. Is there a way to make it inductive?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
GAE is an inductive model: the decoder takes pairs of node embeddings to
predict links, whereas the encoder dynamically constructs these node
embeddings from node features and their local neighborhoods -- both of
these processes can be used in an inductive way on unseen parts of a graph
and/or on new nodes/edges (or on a different graph with similar
features/statistics altogether). If you solely use one-hot vectors as
initial node features, however, any GNN model will typically not generalize
to unseen parts of a graph.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:01 AM Amogh Mishra ***@***.***> wrote:
In GAE, the decoder is trying to reconstruct the adjacency matrix. I
presume that this approach makes the GVAE completely transductive because
an unseen node will not be present in the adjacency matrix during training
and we cannot dynamically change the dimensions of the matrix either. Is
there a way to make it inductive?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#65>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABYBYYBOQF7CZZTRIHZSQ7LR5ZLRNANCNFSM4PKDPMYQ>
.
In GAE, the decoder is trying to reconstruct the adjacency matrix. I presume that this approach makes the GVAE completely transductive because an unseen node will not be present in the adjacency matrix during training and we cannot dynamically change the dimensions of the matrix either. Is there a way to make it inductive?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: