MAINTAINERS: add @ivanhercaz to past organization members #5975
Conversation
marchersimon
added
the
community
|
|
||
| ## Past organization members | ||
|
|
||
| Organization members who have been inactive for some time, but still have write access to all the repositories in the tldr-pages organization and are welcome back any time to return to their old role. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Organization members who have been inactive for some time, but still have write access to all the repositories in the tldr-pages organization and are welcome back any time to return to their old role. | |
| Organization members who have been inactive for some time, still have write access to all the repositories in the tldr-pages organization. After losing organization status, previous members are welcome back any time to return to their old role. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
losing is really too negative, I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Organization members who have been inactive for some time, but still have write access to all the repositories in the tldr-pages organization and are welcome back any time to return to their old role. | |
| Organization members who have been inactive for some time, still have write access to all the repositories in the tldr-pages organization. After releasing organization status, previous members are welcome back any time to return to their old role. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
releasing is less negative than removing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, I completely missed that @marchersimon. I think this is fine as-is?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So we should put both past organization members and owners to the section Past organization owners?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh oops! I've got confused. I'm not sure whether we'd want separate sections or not? Maybe 1 as Past organization owners?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's go with separate sections for now. We can always change it later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@marchersimon could you resolve the conflicts?
|
This PR will likely interact with broader changes we've been discussing for the role management processes, but I won't be able to work on those until about 2 weeks from now. Feel free to merge it if consensus emerges in the meantime. Otherwise, I'd be happy to take a deeper look at it at that time. |
|
Two weeks is June — I don't see any particular reason not to wait. |
|
Hi all! This thread has not had any recent activity. |
github-actions
bot
added
the
waiting
|
Hi all! This thread has not had any recent activity. |
github-actions
bot
added
the
waiting
|
Hi everyone. |
#5932 was accepted by @ivanhercaz, but he was never removed from the organisation. #5975 was closed, without moving @ivanhercaz correctly. This PR fixes this for historical reasons
I created a new "Past orginazation members" section, as described in the COMMUNITY-ROLES and added a description. (However it says the the section should be called "Past organization owners". Probably a typo, I'll fix that in a PR).
Closes #5932