-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rt: batch pop from injection queue when idle #5705
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2c266d0
rt: batch pop from injection queue when idle
carllerche f989344
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into rt-inject-batch-pop
carllerche 8aa109c
fix loom tests
carllerche 97dd738
fix clippy
carllerche b5ef43a
make metrics test more tolerant
carllerche 19887a7
fmt
carllerche e5d0b5e
try again
carllerche d045f31
Merge branch 'master' into rt-inject-batch-pop
carllerche 0f9ae3f
lower max preemptions for loom pool tests
carllerche 15b0189
use iter for queue batch ops
carllerche 7d7e10a
docs and fmt
carllerche a02de09
fix clippy
carllerche c1d51ec
fix clippy again
carllerche fca2093
apply feedback
carllerche File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
style nit: why not just
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Honestly, I'm not too fond of that style. I find
@
syntax there harder to readThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it could also be:
this isn't super important to me, but the reason i'm commenting on it is that the current code had me searching for the place where
maybe_task
was referenced again outside of theif
, but it never actually is referenced again. not a big deal, but i found that slightly weird. 🤷♀️