Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rt(threaded): cap LIFO slot polls #5712
rt(threaded): cap LIFO slot polls #5712
Changes from 5 commits
8b60f58
4ff6296
0c05de8
7722aee
b6d37ea
61dbf13
91e849f
57d550a
5cc3716
e4ae2f8
7701edc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it not be less error-prone to reset
lifo_enabled
after callingtask.run()
? For example, right now you don't reset it in theErr(())
branch. That's probably fine because the worker thread shuts down there, but it is non-obvious.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, in the error case, the
core
is stolen. We cannot reset it either way. That said, it brings up a point that we need to reset it if it is stolen.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe just reset before polling a task ...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reset before polling a task isn't robust either because we can schedule tasks outside of the context of running a task. e.g. from polling the I/O driver.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead, what I suggest is we add debug_asserts around to ensure the value is correct.