Merge pull request #1 from torvalds/master #406

RealMG · 2017-04-21T09:18:27Z

Update from origin

KernelPRBot · 2017-04-21T09:20:07Z

Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel!

Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch.

Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process.

Here's what to do:

Format your contribution according to kernel requirements
Decide who to send your contribution to
Set up your system to send your contribution as an email
Send your contribution and wait for feedback

How do I format my contribution?

The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations.

Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea.

You can create patches with git format-patch.

Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary.

Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with.

Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel.

Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this.

Who do I send my contribution to?

The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes.

If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the get_maintainer.pl script in the kernel source can help you.

get_maintainer.pl will take the patch or patches you created in the previous step, and tell you who is responsible for them, and what mailing lists are used. You can also take a look at the MAINTAINERS file by hand.

Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches.

It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.)

How do I send my contribution?

Use git send-email, which will ensure that your patches are formatted in the standard manner. In order to use git send-email, you'll need to configure git to use your SMTP email server.

For more information about using git send-email, look at the Git documentation or type git help send-email. There are a number of useful guides and tutorials about git send-email that can be found on the internet.

How do I get help if I'm stuck?

Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed.

Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine.

If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:

Kernel Newbies - this website contains a lot of useful resources for new kernel developers.
If you'd like a step-by-step, challenge-based introduction to kernel development, the Eudyptula Challenge would be an excellent start.
The kernel documentation - see also the Documentation directory in the kernel tree.

If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers!

I sent my patch - now what?

You wait.

You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at.

Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:

You might get a response to your email. Often these will be comments, which may require you to make changes to your patch, or explain why your way is the best way. You should respond to these comments, and you may need to submit another revision of your patch to address the issues raised.
Your patch might be merged into the subsystem tree. Code that becomes part of Linux isn't merged into the main repository straight away - it first goes into the subsystem tree, which is managed by the subsystem maintainer. It is then batched up with a number of other changes sent to Linus for inclusion. (This process is described in some detail in the kernel development process guide).
Your patch might be ignored completely. This happens sometimes - don't take it personally. Here's what to do:
- Wait a bit more - patches often take several weeks to get a response; more if they were sent at a busy time.
- Kernel developers often silently ignore patches that break the rules. Check for obvious violations of the the Submitting Patches guidelines, the style guidelines, and any other documentation you can find about your subsystem. Check that you're sending your patch to the right place.
- Try again later. When you resend it, don't add angry commentary, as that will get your patch ignored. It might also get you silently blacklisted.

Further information

Working with the kernel development community - the official documentation for new kernel contributors

Happy hacking!

This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot.

Update

Merge the latest linux code

lkl: fix valgrind tests remained issues

Update

Because of both sides doing L2CAP disconnection at the same time, it was possible to receive L2CAP Disconnection Response with CID that was already freed. That caused problems if CID was already reused and L2CAP Connection Request with same CID was sent out. Before this patch kernel deleted channel context regardless of the state of the channel. Example where leftover Disconnection Response (frame torvalds#402) causes local device to delete L2CAP channel which was not yet connected. This in turn confuses remote device's stack because same CID is re-used without properly disconnecting. Btmon capture before patch: ** snip ** > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 torvalds#394 [hci1] 10.748949 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 torvalds#395 [hci1] 10.749062 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 torvalds#396 [hci1] 10.749073 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#397 [hci1] 10.752391 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#398 [hci1] 10.753394 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 torvalds#399 [hci1] 10.756499 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 torvalds#400 [hci1] 10.756548 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 torvalds#401 [hci1] 10.757459 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 torvalds#402 [hci1] 10.759148 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 = bluetoothd: 00:1E:AB:4C:56:54: error updating services: Input/o.. 10.759447 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#403 [hci1] 10.759386 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 torvalds#404 [hci1] 10.760397 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 27 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 torvalds#405 [hci1] 10.760441 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 27 len 8 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 torvalds#406 [hci1] 10.760449 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 19 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#407 [hci1] 10.761399 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 torvalds#408 [hci1] 10.762942 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Similar case after the patch: *snip* > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 #22702 [hci0] 1664.411056 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 #22703 [hci0] 1664.411136 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22704 [hci0] 1664.411143 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22705 [hci0] 1664.414009 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22706 [hci0] 1664.415007 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22707 [hci0] 1664.418674 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22708 [hci0] 1664.418762 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22709 [hci0] 1664.421073 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 12 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22710 [hci0] 1664.421371 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22711 [hci0] 1664.424082 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22712 [hci0] 1664.425040 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22713 [hci0] 1664.426103 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 #22714 [hci0] 1664.426186 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 #22715 [hci0] 1664.426196 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 13 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 #22716 [hci0] 1664.428804 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 12 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Fix is to check that channel is in state BT_DISCONN before deleting the channel. This bug was found while fuzzing Bluez's OBEX implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Matti Kamunen <matti.kamunen@synopsys.com> Reported-by: Ari Timonen <ari.timonen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com>

Because of both sides doing L2CAP disconnection at the same time, it was possible to receive L2CAP Disconnection Response with CID that was already freed. That caused problems if CID was already reused and L2CAP Connection Request with same CID was sent out. Before this patch kernel deleted channel context regardless of the state of the channel. Example where leftover Disconnection Response (frame torvalds#402) causes local device to delete L2CAP channel which was not yet connected. This in turn confuses remote device's stack because same CID is re-used without properly disconnecting. Btmon capture before patch: ** snip ** > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 torvalds#394 [hci1] 10.748949 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 torvalds#395 [hci1] 10.749062 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 torvalds#396 [hci1] 10.749073 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#397 [hci1] 10.752391 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#398 [hci1] 10.753394 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 torvalds#399 [hci1] 10.756499 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 torvalds#400 [hci1] 10.756548 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 torvalds#401 [hci1] 10.757459 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 torvalds#402 [hci1] 10.759148 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 = bluetoothd: 00:1E:AB:4C:56:54: error updating services: Input/o.. 10.759447 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#403 [hci1] 10.759386 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 torvalds#404 [hci1] 10.760397 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 27 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 torvalds#405 [hci1] 10.760441 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 27 len 8 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 torvalds#406 [hci1] 10.760449 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 19 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#407 [hci1] 10.761399 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 torvalds#408 [hci1] 10.762942 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Similar case after the patch: *snip* > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 #22702 [hci0] 1664.411056 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 #22703 [hci0] 1664.411136 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22704 [hci0] 1664.411143 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22705 [hci0] 1664.414009 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22706 [hci0] 1664.415007 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22707 [hci0] 1664.418674 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22708 [hci0] 1664.418762 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22709 [hci0] 1664.421073 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 12 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22710 [hci0] 1664.421371 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22711 [hci0] 1664.424082 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22712 [hci0] 1664.425040 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22713 [hci0] 1664.426103 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 #22714 [hci0] 1664.426186 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 #22715 [hci0] 1664.426196 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 13 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 #22716 [hci0] 1664.428804 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 12 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Fix is to check that channel is in state BT_DISCONN before deleting the channel. This bug was found while fuzzing Bluez's OBEX implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Matti Kamunen <matti.kamunen@synopsys.com> Reported-by: Ari Timonen <ari.timonen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

[ Upstream commit 28261da ] Because of both sides doing L2CAP disconnection at the same time, it was possible to receive L2CAP Disconnection Response with CID that was already freed. That caused problems if CID was already reused and L2CAP Connection Request with same CID was sent out. Before this patch kernel deleted channel context regardless of the state of the channel. Example where leftover Disconnection Response (frame torvalds#402) causes local device to delete L2CAP channel which was not yet connected. This in turn confuses remote device's stack because same CID is re-used without properly disconnecting. Btmon capture before patch: ** snip ** > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 torvalds#394 [hci1] 10.748949 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 torvalds#395 [hci1] 10.749062 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 torvalds#396 [hci1] 10.749073 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#397 [hci1] 10.752391 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#398 [hci1] 10.753394 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 torvalds#399 [hci1] 10.756499 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 torvalds#400 [hci1] 10.756548 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 torvalds#401 [hci1] 10.757459 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 torvalds#402 [hci1] 10.759148 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 = bluetoothd: 00:1E:AB:4C:56:54: error updating services: Input/o.. 10.759447 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#403 [hci1] 10.759386 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 torvalds#404 [hci1] 10.760397 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 27 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 torvalds#405 [hci1] 10.760441 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 27 len 8 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 torvalds#406 [hci1] 10.760449 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 19 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#407 [hci1] 10.761399 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 torvalds#408 [hci1] 10.762942 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Similar case after the patch: *snip* > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 #22702 [hci0] 1664.411056 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 #22703 [hci0] 1664.411136 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22704 [hci0] 1664.411143 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22705 [hci0] 1664.414009 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22706 [hci0] 1664.415007 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22707 [hci0] 1664.418674 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22708 [hci0] 1664.418762 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22709 [hci0] 1664.421073 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 12 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22710 [hci0] 1664.421371 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22711 [hci0] 1664.424082 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22712 [hci0] 1664.425040 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22713 [hci0] 1664.426103 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 #22714 [hci0] 1664.426186 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 #22715 [hci0] 1664.426196 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 13 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 #22716 [hci0] 1664.428804 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 12 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Fix is to check that channel is in state BT_DISCONN before deleting the channel. This bug was found while fuzzing Bluez's OBEX implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Matti Kamunen <matti.kamunen@synopsys.com> Reported-by: Ari Timonen <ari.timonen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 28261da ] Because of both sides doing L2CAP disconnection at the same time, it was possible to receive L2CAP Disconnection Response with CID that was already freed. That caused problems if CID was already reused and L2CAP Connection Request with same CID was sent out. Before this patch kernel deleted channel context regardless of the state of the channel. Example where leftover Disconnection Response (frame #402) causes local device to delete L2CAP channel which was not yet connected. This in turn confuses remote device's stack because same CID is re-used without properly disconnecting. Btmon capture before patch: ** snip ** > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 #394 [hci1] 10.748949 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 #395 [hci1] 10.749062 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #396 [hci1] 10.749073 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #397 [hci1] 10.752391 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #398 [hci1] 10.753394 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #399 [hci1] 10.756499 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #400 [hci1] 10.756548 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #401 [hci1] 10.757459 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #402 [hci1] 10.759148 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 = bluetoothd: 00:1E:AB:4C:56:54: error updating services: Input/o.. 10.759447 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #403 [hci1] 10.759386 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #404 [hci1] 10.760397 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 27 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 #405 [hci1] 10.760441 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 27 len 8 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 #406 [hci1] 10.760449 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 19 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #407 [hci1] 10.761399 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 #408 [hci1] 10.762942 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Similar case after the patch: *snip* > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 #22702 [hci0] 1664.411056 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 #22703 [hci0] 1664.411136 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22704 [hci0] 1664.411143 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22705 [hci0] 1664.414009 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22706 [hci0] 1664.415007 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22707 [hci0] 1664.418674 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22708 [hci0] 1664.418762 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22709 [hci0] 1664.421073 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 12 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22710 [hci0] 1664.421371 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22711 [hci0] 1664.424082 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22712 [hci0] 1664.425040 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22713 [hci0] 1664.426103 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 #22714 [hci0] 1664.426186 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 #22715 [hci0] 1664.426196 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 13 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 #22716 [hci0] 1664.428804 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 12 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Fix is to check that channel is in state BT_DISCONN before deleting the channel. This bug was found while fuzzing Bluez's OBEX implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Matti Kamunen <matti.kamunen@synopsys.com> Reported-by: Ari Timonen <ari.timonen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 28261da ] Because of both sides doing L2CAP disconnection at the same time, it was possible to receive L2CAP Disconnection Response with CID that was already freed. That caused problems if CID was already reused and L2CAP Connection Request with same CID was sent out. Before this patch kernel deleted channel context regardless of the state of the channel. Example where leftover Disconnection Response (frame torvalds#402) causes local device to delete L2CAP channel which was not yet connected. This in turn confuses remote device's stack because same CID is re-used without properly disconnecting. Btmon capture before patch: ** snip ** > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 torvalds#394 [hci1] 10.748949 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 torvalds#395 [hci1] 10.749062 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 torvalds#396 [hci1] 10.749073 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#397 [hci1] 10.752391 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#398 [hci1] 10.753394 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 torvalds#399 [hci1] 10.756499 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 torvalds#400 [hci1] 10.756548 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 torvalds#401 [hci1] 10.757459 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 torvalds#402 [hci1] 10.759148 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 = bluetoothd: 00:1E:AB:4C:56:54: error updating services: Input/o.. 10.759447 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#403 [hci1] 10.759386 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 torvalds#404 [hci1] 10.760397 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 27 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 torvalds#405 [hci1] 10.760441 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 27 len 8 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 torvalds#406 [hci1] 10.760449 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 19 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 torvalds#407 [hci1] 10.761399 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 torvalds#408 [hci1] 10.762942 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Similar case after the patch: *snip* > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 #22702 [hci0] 1664.411056 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 #22703 [hci0] 1664.411136 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22704 [hci0] 1664.411143 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22705 [hci0] 1664.414009 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22706 [hci0] 1664.415007 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22707 [hci0] 1664.418674 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22708 [hci0] 1664.418762 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22709 [hci0] 1664.421073 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 12 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22710 [hci0] 1664.421371 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22711 [hci0] 1664.424082 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22712 [hci0] 1664.425040 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22713 [hci0] 1664.426103 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 #22714 [hci0] 1664.426186 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 #22715 [hci0] 1664.426196 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 13 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 #22716 [hci0] 1664.428804 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 12 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Fix is to check that channel is in state BT_DISCONN before deleting the channel. This bug was found while fuzzing Bluez's OBEX implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Matti Kamunen <matti.kamunen@synopsys.com> Reported-by: Ari Timonen <ari.timonen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 22451a1 ] When we have a corrupted main.sqlite in /var/lib/nfs/nfsdcld/, it may result in namelen being 0, which will cause memdup_user() to return ZERO_SIZE_PTR. When we access the name.data that has been assigned the value of ZERO_SIZE_PTR in nfs4_client_to_reclaim(), null pointer dereference is triggered. [ T1205] ================================================================== [ T1205] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] Read of size 1 at addr 0000000000000010 by task nfsdcld/1205 [ T1205] [ T1205] CPU: 11 PID: 1205 Comm: nfsdcld Not tainted 5.10.0-00003-g2c1423731b8d torvalds#406 [ T1205] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014 [ T1205] Call Trace: [ T1205] dump_stack+0x9a/0xd0 [ T1205] ? nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] __kasan_report.cold+0x34/0x84 [ T1205] ? nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 [ T1205] nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] ? nfsd4_release_lockowner+0x410/0x410 [ T1205] cld_pipe_downcall+0x5ca/0x760 [ T1205] ? nfsd4_cld_tracking_exit+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ T1205] ? down_write_killable_nested+0x170/0x170 [ T1205] ? avc_policy_seqno+0x28/0x40 [ T1205] ? selinux_file_permission+0x1b4/0x1e0 [ T1205] rpc_pipe_write+0x84/0xb0 [ T1205] vfs_write+0x143/0x520 [ T1205] ksys_write+0xc9/0x170 [ T1205] ? __ia32_sys_read+0x50/0x50 [ T1205] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xfe/0x110 [ T1205] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xa2/0x110 [ T1205] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [ T1205] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1 [ T1205] RIP: 0033:0x7fdbdb761bc7 [ T1205] Code: 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 514 [ T1205] RSP: 002b:00007fff8c4b7248 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ T1205] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000042b RCX: 00007fdbdb761bc7 [ T1205] RDX: 000000000000042b RSI: 00007fff8c4b75f0 RDI: 0000000000000008 [ T1205] RBP: 00007fdbdb761bb0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 [ T1205] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000042b [ T1205] R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 00007fff8c4b75f0 R15: 0000000000000000 [ T1205] ================================================================== Fix it by checking namelen. Signed-off-by: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@huawei.com> Fixes: 7472595 ("nfsd: un-deprecate nfsdcld") Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com> Tested-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

The following BUG was triggered. sugov_update_shared() locks a raw_spinlock while cpc_write() locks a spinlock. To have a correct wait-type order, update rmw_lock to a raw_spinlock. Also save irq state. ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.12.0-rc2-XXX torvalds#406 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/1:1/62 is trying to lock: ffffff8801593030 (&cpc_ptr->rmw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 2 locks held by kworker/1:1/62: #0: ffffff897ef5ec98 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2c/0x50 #1: ffffff880154e238 (&sg_policy->update_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: sugov_update_shared+0x3c/0x280 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-g9654bd3e8806 torvalds#406 Workqueue: 0x0 (events) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xa4/0x130 show_stack+0x20/0x38 dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xd0 dump_stack+0x18/0x28 __lock_acquire+0x480/0x1ad8 lock_acquire+0x114/0x310 _raw_spin_lock+0x50/0x70 cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 cppc_set_perf+0xa0/0x3a8 cppc_cpufreq_fast_switch+0x40/0xc0 cpufreq_driver_fast_switch+0x4c/0x218 sugov_update_shared+0x234/0x280 update_load_avg+0x6ec/0x7b8 dequeue_entities+0x108/0x830 dequeue_task_fair+0x58/0x408 __schedule+0x4f0/0x1070 schedule+0x54/0x130 worker_thread+0xc0/0x2e8 kthread+0x130/0x148 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Fixes: 60949b7 ("ACPI: CPPC: Fix MASK_VAL() usage") Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>

The following BUG was triggered: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.12.0-rc2-XXX torvalds#406 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/1:1/62 is trying to lock: ffffff8801593030 (&cpc_ptr->rmw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 2 locks held by kworker/1:1/62: #0: ffffff897ef5ec98 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2c/0x50 #1: ffffff880154e238 (&sg_policy->update_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: sugov_update_shared+0x3c/0x280 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-g9654bd3e8806 torvalds#406 Workqueue: 0x0 (events) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xa4/0x130 show_stack+0x20/0x38 dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xd0 dump_stack+0x18/0x28 __lock_acquire+0x480/0x1ad8 lock_acquire+0x114/0x310 _raw_spin_lock+0x50/0x70 cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 cppc_set_perf+0xa0/0x3a8 cppc_cpufreq_fast_switch+0x40/0xc0 cpufreq_driver_fast_switch+0x4c/0x218 sugov_update_shared+0x234/0x280 update_load_avg+0x6ec/0x7b8 dequeue_entities+0x108/0x830 dequeue_task_fair+0x58/0x408 __schedule+0x4f0/0x1070 schedule+0x54/0x130 worker_thread+0xc0/0x2e8 kthread+0x130/0x148 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 sugov_update_shared() locks a raw_spinlock while cpc_write() locks a spinlock. To have a correct wait-type order, update rmw_lock to a raw spinlock and ensure that interrupts will be disabled on the CPU holding it. Fixes: 60949b7 ("ACPI: CPPC: Fix MASK_VAL() usage") Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241028125657.1271512-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 1c10941 ] The following BUG was triggered: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.12.0-rc2-XXX torvalds#406 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/1:1/62 is trying to lock: ffffff8801593030 (&cpc_ptr->rmw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 2 locks held by kworker/1:1/62: #0: ffffff897ef5ec98 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2c/0x50 #1: ffffff880154e238 (&sg_policy->update_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: sugov_update_shared+0x3c/0x280 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-g9654bd3e8806 torvalds#406 Workqueue: 0x0 (events) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xa4/0x130 show_stack+0x20/0x38 dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xd0 dump_stack+0x18/0x28 __lock_acquire+0x480/0x1ad8 lock_acquire+0x114/0x310 _raw_spin_lock+0x50/0x70 cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 cppc_set_perf+0xa0/0x3a8 cppc_cpufreq_fast_switch+0x40/0xc0 cpufreq_driver_fast_switch+0x4c/0x218 sugov_update_shared+0x234/0x280 update_load_avg+0x6ec/0x7b8 dequeue_entities+0x108/0x830 dequeue_task_fair+0x58/0x408 __schedule+0x4f0/0x1070 schedule+0x54/0x130 worker_thread+0xc0/0x2e8 kthread+0x130/0x148 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 sugov_update_shared() locks a raw_spinlock while cpc_write() locks a spinlock. To have a correct wait-type order, update rmw_lock to a raw spinlock and ensure that interrupts will be disabled on the CPU holding it. Fixes: 60949b7 ("ACPI: CPPC: Fix MASK_VAL() usage") Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241028125657.1271512-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

The timer_lockup test needs 2 CPUs to work, on single-CPU nodes it fails to set thread affinity to CPU 1 since it doesn't exist: # ./test_progs -t test_lockup test_timer_lockup:PASS:timer_lockup__open_and_load 0 nsec test_timer_lockup:PASS:pthread_create thread1 0 nsec test_timer_lockup:PASS:pthread_create thread2 0 nsec timer_lockup_thread:PASS:cpu affinity 0 nsec timer_lockup_thread:FAIL:cpu affinity unexpected error: 22 (errno 0) test_timer_lockup:PASS: 0 nsec torvalds#406 timer_lockup:FAIL Skip the test if only 1 CPU is available. Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com> Fixes: 50bd5a0 ("selftests/bpf: Add timer lockup selftest")

[ Upstream commit 22451a1 ] When we have a corrupted main.sqlite in /var/lib/nfs/nfsdcld/, it may result in namelen being 0, which will cause memdup_user() to return ZERO_SIZE_PTR. When we access the name.data that has been assigned the value of ZERO_SIZE_PTR in nfs4_client_to_reclaim(), null pointer dereference is triggered. [ T1205] ================================================================== [ T1205] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] Read of size 1 at addr 0000000000000010 by task nfsdcld/1205 [ T1205] [ T1205] CPU: 11 PID: 1205 Comm: nfsdcld Not tainted 5.10.0-00003-g2c1423731b8d torvalds#406 [ T1205] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014 [ T1205] Call Trace: [ T1205] dump_stack+0x9a/0xd0 [ T1205] ? nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] __kasan_report.cold+0x34/0x84 [ T1205] ? nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 [ T1205] nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] ? nfsd4_release_lockowner+0x410/0x410 [ T1205] cld_pipe_downcall+0x5ca/0x760 [ T1205] ? nfsd4_cld_tracking_exit+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ T1205] ? down_write_killable_nested+0x170/0x170 [ T1205] ? avc_policy_seqno+0x28/0x40 [ T1205] ? selinux_file_permission+0x1b4/0x1e0 [ T1205] rpc_pipe_write+0x84/0xb0 [ T1205] vfs_write+0x143/0x520 [ T1205] ksys_write+0xc9/0x170 [ T1205] ? __ia32_sys_read+0x50/0x50 [ T1205] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xfe/0x110 [ T1205] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xa2/0x110 [ T1205] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [ T1205] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1 [ T1205] RIP: 0033:0x7fdbdb761bc7 [ T1205] Code: 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 514 [ T1205] RSP: 002b:00007fff8c4b7248 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ T1205] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000042b RCX: 00007fdbdb761bc7 [ T1205] RDX: 000000000000042b RSI: 00007fff8c4b75f0 RDI: 0000000000000008 [ T1205] RBP: 00007fdbdb761bb0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 [ T1205] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000042b [ T1205] R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 00007fff8c4b75f0 R15: 0000000000000000 [ T1205] ================================================================== Fix it by checking namelen. Signed-off-by: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@huawei.com> Fixes: 7472595 ("nfsd: un-deprecate nfsdcld") Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com> Tested-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 1c10941 ] The following BUG was triggered: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.12.0-rc2-XXX torvalds#406 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/1:1/62 is trying to lock: ffffff8801593030 (&cpc_ptr->rmw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 2 locks held by kworker/1:1/62: #0: ffffff897ef5ec98 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2c/0x50 #1: ffffff880154e238 (&sg_policy->update_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: sugov_update_shared+0x3c/0x280 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-g9654bd3e8806 torvalds#406 Workqueue: 0x0 (events) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xa4/0x130 show_stack+0x20/0x38 dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xd0 dump_stack+0x18/0x28 __lock_acquire+0x480/0x1ad8 lock_acquire+0x114/0x310 _raw_spin_lock+0x50/0x70 cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 cppc_set_perf+0xa0/0x3a8 cppc_cpufreq_fast_switch+0x40/0xc0 cpufreq_driver_fast_switch+0x4c/0x218 sugov_update_shared+0x234/0x280 update_load_avg+0x6ec/0x7b8 dequeue_entities+0x108/0x830 dequeue_task_fair+0x58/0x408 __schedule+0x4f0/0x1070 schedule+0x54/0x130 worker_thread+0xc0/0x2e8 kthread+0x130/0x148 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 sugov_update_shared() locks a raw_spinlock while cpc_write() locks a spinlock. To have a correct wait-type order, update rmw_lock to a raw spinlock and ensure that interrupts will be disabled on the CPU holding it. Fixes: 60949b7 ("ACPI: CPPC: Fix MASK_VAL() usage") Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241028125657.1271512-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

The timer_lockup test needs 2 CPUs to work, on single-CPU nodes it fails to set thread affinity to CPU 1 since it doesn't exist: # ./test_progs -t timer_lockup test_timer_lockup:PASS:timer_lockup__open_and_load 0 nsec test_timer_lockup:PASS:pthread_create thread1 0 nsec test_timer_lockup:PASS:pthread_create thread2 0 nsec timer_lockup_thread:PASS:cpu affinity 0 nsec timer_lockup_thread:FAIL:cpu affinity unexpected error: 22 (errno 0) test_timer_lockup:PASS: 0 nsec torvalds#406 timer_lockup:FAIL Skip the test if only 1 CPU is available. Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com> Fixes: 50bd5a0 ("selftests/bpf: Add timer lockup selftest") Tested-by: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107115231.75200-1-vmalik@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The timer_lockup test needs 2 CPUs to work, on single-CPU nodes it fails to set thread affinity to CPU 1 since it doesn't exist: # ./test_progs -t timer_lockup test_timer_lockup:PASS:timer_lockup__open_and_load 0 nsec test_timer_lockup:PASS:pthread_create thread1 0 nsec test_timer_lockup:PASS:pthread_create thread2 0 nsec timer_lockup_thread:PASS:cpu affinity 0 nsec timer_lockup_thread:FAIL:cpu affinity unexpected error: 22 (errno 0) test_timer_lockup:PASS: 0 nsec torvalds#406 timer_lockup:FAIL Skip the test if only 1 CPU is available. Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com> Fixes: 50bd5a0 ("selftests/bpf: Add timer lockup selftest") Tested-by: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107115231.75200-1-vmalik@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 1c10941 ] The following BUG was triggered: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.12.0-rc2-XXX torvalds#406 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/1:1/62 is trying to lock: ffffff8801593030 (&cpc_ptr->rmw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 2 locks held by kworker/1:1/62: #0: ffffff897ef5ec98 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2c/0x50 #1: ffffff880154e238 (&sg_policy->update_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: sugov_update_shared+0x3c/0x280 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-g9654bd3e8806 torvalds#406 Workqueue: 0x0 (events) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xa4/0x130 show_stack+0x20/0x38 dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xd0 dump_stack+0x18/0x28 __lock_acquire+0x480/0x1ad8 lock_acquire+0x114/0x310 _raw_spin_lock+0x50/0x70 cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 cppc_set_perf+0xa0/0x3a8 cppc_cpufreq_fast_switch+0x40/0xc0 cpufreq_driver_fast_switch+0x4c/0x218 sugov_update_shared+0x234/0x280 update_load_avg+0x6ec/0x7b8 dequeue_entities+0x108/0x830 dequeue_task_fair+0x58/0x408 __schedule+0x4f0/0x1070 schedule+0x54/0x130 worker_thread+0xc0/0x2e8 kthread+0x130/0x148 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 sugov_update_shared() locks a raw_spinlock while cpc_write() locks a spinlock. To have a correct wait-type order, update rmw_lock to a raw spinlock and ensure that interrupts will be disabled on the CPU holding it. Fixes: 60949b7 ("ACPI: CPPC: Fix MASK_VAL() usage") Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241028125657.1271512-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 2060f07 ] Add a tracepoint with __nullable suffix in bpf_testmod, and add cases for it: $ ./test_progs -t "tp_btf_nullable" torvalds#406/1 tp_btf_nullable/handle_tp_btf_nullable_bare1:OK torvalds#406/2 tp_btf_nullable/handle_tp_btf_nullable_bare2:OK torvalds#406 tp_btf_nullable:OK Summary: 1/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240911033719.91468-3-lulie@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Stable-dep-of: cb4158c ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 937a1c2 ] The timer_lockup test needs 2 CPUs to work, on single-CPU nodes it fails to set thread affinity to CPU 1 since it doesn't exist: # ./test_progs -t timer_lockup test_timer_lockup:PASS:timer_lockup__open_and_load 0 nsec test_timer_lockup:PASS:pthread_create thread1 0 nsec test_timer_lockup:PASS:pthread_create thread2 0 nsec timer_lockup_thread:PASS:cpu affinity 0 nsec timer_lockup_thread:FAIL:cpu affinity unexpected error: 22 (errno 0) test_timer_lockup:PASS: 0 nsec torvalds#406 timer_lockup:FAIL Skip the test if only 1 CPU is available. Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com> Fixes: 50bd5a0 ("selftests/bpf: Add timer lockup selftest") Tested-by: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107115231.75200-1-vmalik@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 2060f07 ] Add a tracepoint with __nullable suffix in bpf_testmod, and add cases for it: $ ./test_progs -t "tp_btf_nullable" torvalds#406/1 tp_btf_nullable/handle_tp_btf_nullable_bare1:OK torvalds#406/2 tp_btf_nullable/handle_tp_btf_nullable_bare2:OK torvalds#406 tp_btf_nullable:OK Summary: 1/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240911033719.91468-3-lulie@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Stable-dep-of: cb4158c ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 937a1c2 ] The timer_lockup test needs 2 CPUs to work, on single-CPU nodes it fails to set thread affinity to CPU 1 since it doesn't exist: # ./test_progs -t timer_lockup test_timer_lockup:PASS:timer_lockup__open_and_load 0 nsec test_timer_lockup:PASS:pthread_create thread1 0 nsec test_timer_lockup:PASS:pthread_create thread2 0 nsec timer_lockup_thread:PASS:cpu affinity 0 nsec timer_lockup_thread:FAIL:cpu affinity unexpected error: 22 (errno 0) test_timer_lockup:PASS: 0 nsec torvalds#406 timer_lockup:FAIL Skip the test if only 1 CPU is available. Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com> Fixes: 50bd5a0 ("selftests/bpf: Add timer lockup selftest") Tested-by: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107115231.75200-1-vmalik@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 1c10941 ] The following BUG was triggered: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.12.0-rc2-XXX torvalds#406 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/1:1/62 is trying to lock: ffffff8801593030 (&cpc_ptr->rmw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 2 locks held by kworker/1:1/62: #0: ffffff897ef5ec98 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2c/0x50 #1: ffffff880154e238 (&sg_policy->update_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: sugov_update_shared+0x3c/0x280 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-g9654bd3e8806 torvalds#406 Workqueue: 0x0 (events) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xa4/0x130 show_stack+0x20/0x38 dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xd0 dump_stack+0x18/0x28 __lock_acquire+0x480/0x1ad8 lock_acquire+0x114/0x310 _raw_spin_lock+0x50/0x70 cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 cppc_set_perf+0xa0/0x3a8 cppc_cpufreq_fast_switch+0x40/0xc0 cpufreq_driver_fast_switch+0x4c/0x218 sugov_update_shared+0x234/0x280 update_load_avg+0x6ec/0x7b8 dequeue_entities+0x108/0x830 dequeue_task_fair+0x58/0x408 __schedule+0x4f0/0x1070 schedule+0x54/0x130 worker_thread+0xc0/0x2e8 kthread+0x130/0x148 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 sugov_update_shared() locks a raw_spinlock while cpc_write() locks a spinlock. To have a correct wait-type order, update rmw_lock to a raw spinlock and ensure that interrupts will be disabled on the CPU holding it. Fixes: 60949b7 ("ACPI: CPPC: Fix MASK_VAL() usage") Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241028125657.1271512-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

Merge pull request #1 from torvalds/master

ff0faee

Update from origin

RealMG added 2 commits September 22, 2017 13:57

Merge pull request #2 from torvalds/master

00ed905

Update

Merge pull request #3 from torvalds/master

b4f2796

Merge the latest linux code

Mic92 pushed a commit to Mic92/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2019

Merge pull request torvalds#406 from libos-nuse/fix-valgrind-take2

bbd1206

lkl: fix valgrind tests remained issues

Merge pull request #4 from torvalds/master

2a57519

Update

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Merge pull request #1 from torvalds/master #406

Merge pull request #1 from torvalds/master #406

RealMG commented Apr 21, 2017

KernelPRBot commented Apr 21, 2017

Merge pull request #1 from torvalds/master #406

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Merge pull request #1 from torvalds/master #406

Conversation

RealMG commented Apr 21, 2017

KernelPRBot commented Apr 21, 2017

How do I format my contribution?

Who do I send my contribution to?

How do I send my contribution?

How do I get help if I'm stuck?

I sent my patch - now what?

Further information