WIP - tox 4 #1400
WIP - tox 4 #1400
Conversation
gaborbernat
force-pushed
the
docker
branch
4 times, most recently
from
bdcfa3f
to
6a1cb8a
Compare
|
lmk when you want me to take a look at this (@-me), going to mute until then o7 |
|
@asottile probably not in the next two weeks 👍 no worries |
gaborbernat
force-pushed
the
docker
branch
7 times, most recently
from
caf86f7
to
043db4c
Compare
| """Report the status of a tox environment""" | ||
|
|
||
| def __init__(self, result_log, name, content): | ||
| self.reportlog = result_log |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@gaborbernat
JFI: this is unused (also now already (27d7a6a - feel free to pick it, but I've thought it could be an API break etc))
|
I have some time and more importantly mind space now and would like to work my way into this, would this make sense at the moment @gaborbernat? |
|
It's definitely possible; though mind you the state of this branch is a very early alpha, with not all platforms supported yet 👍 Maybe first look at the code and tell me your thoughts 👍 I do plan to pick this up eventually but first would like to roll out the virtualenv rewrite. |
|
o.k. I am especially interested atm on how this can help us integrating docker better and how we can improve reporting. I am not 100% sure yet if a rewrite is a really good idea or a more incremental approach (which my gut feeling rather would tend to), but I'll definitely have a look to get a feeling for the direction you are heading. |
|
As someone who maintains a POC version of the docker thing my experience is that a major rewrite is necessariy to make it sustainable. We want to end up with something that's also fast, not just correct; and does not require patching in 5 different locations. In the current state of things none of these three are easily achievable. 😢 The rewrite will make this possible though I feel like. |
|
Will close for now, 👍 |
No description provided.