Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix vignettes #8

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 28, 2021
Merged

Fix vignettes #8

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 28, 2021

Conversation

tpronk
Copy link
Owner

@tpronk tpronk commented Sep 28, 2021

Fixes #4

Thomas Pronk added 2 commits June 29, 2021 12:41
BF: Corrected call to split_ci and permutated splitting terminology
51ce16c
ENH: by_split supports values of > 0.5 <= 1.0 for split_p argument wh…
602cf49 
…en splitting permutated

If split_p values of > 0.5 <= 1.0 and replace = FALSE, then a permutated split (method == "random") samples in an unbalanced fashion, assigning split_p trials to score_1 and (1 - split_p) trials to score_2
@tpronk tpronk merged commit 3a8d2b5 into main Sep 28, 2021
@tpronk tpronk deleted the fix_vignettes branch September 14, 2023 15:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

In the vignettes, the second argument to split_ci should be a coefficient function
1 participant
@tpronk