Cran preparation for APCalign 0.0.1 release

[fontikar]

Address #84

• Updated DESCRIPTION
• Added and updated NEWS.md
• cran_comments.md
• Updates to Rbuilldignore

[wcornwell]

do we want to resolve #70 as part of this?

[fontikar]

do we want to resolve #70 as part of this?

Can do.
What do you think you of these roles? Following these guidelines
@dfalster auth, cre
@ehwenk auth, ctb
@wcornwell auth, ctb
@fontikar auth, ctb (though I am not sure how much I can contribute to writing about plant taxonomy so happy to be ctb only)
Carl B ctb for contentID? Would he like to be on paper as auth?
Unsure about Herve's role (my guess auth)
Waiting on Anna Monroe and Anne Fuchs (both probably auth, ctb)
Unsure about Fabrice, and Ruby and Sophie

[dfalster]

Hi @fontikar , good idea. Regarding the uncertainty

• Carl B as ctb for contentID: yes, for now, we'll invite his for paper and we can update role later as needed
• Herve : not yet, might contribute to paper and we can add then
• Anna Monroe and Anne Fuchs (both probably auth, ctb): leave off for now, can add later
• Fabrice: no, he contributed to another package which I used as template for this, but we've swapped that out for contentID
• Ruby and Sophie: only very small commits so don't list yet. Would be good to involve them in paper with use cases and testing, we can add them then if they contribute there .

[wcornwell]

COPYRIGHT HOLDER: Your name here

APCalign/LICENSE

Line 2 in 46394e0

COPYRIGHT HOLDER: Your name here

[wcornwell]

looks good

[ctb]

(note I'm @ctb ;)

[fontikar]

Oh dear so sorry for the tag! Thanks for dropping by 😅