feat(connect-cardano): allow external reward addresses in governance registrations #7768
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The corresponding firmware PR is here. Changes in Cardano CIP-36 vote key registrations:
The address to receive voting rewards can be provided as an address string (
paymentAddress
) instead of address parameters.Renamed identifiers (initiated by clarifications in CIP-36, context e.g. here and here):
governance
replaced bycVote
(all occurences)rewardAddressParameters
replaced bypaymentAddressParameters
votingPublicKey
replaced byvotePublicKey
The changes are also present in the public API, but I kept silent support for the old names, like we did in feat(cardano): add support for CIP-36 Catalyst registration format #6735 when we replaced
catalyst
bygovernance
(I know that the renaming frequency is a bit unfortunate, but the Cardano terminology seems to be still evolving). Is this alright or would you prefer a different solution?