Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(model): fix wrong syntax of version policy #7317

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KOREAN139
Copy link

@KOREAN139 KOREAN139 commented Jun 4, 2024

What does the PR do?

As version_policy is message, it should not have colon after field name. fixed the wrong pbtxt syntaxes to prevent the confusion

Checklist

  • I have read the Contribution guidelines and signed the Contributor License
    Agreement
  • PR title reflects the change and is of format <commit_type>: <Title>
  • Changes are described in the pull request.
  • Related issues are referenced.
  • Populated github labels field
  • Added test plan and verified test passes.
  • Verified that the PR passes existing CI.
  • I ran pre-commit locally (pre-commit install, pre-commit run --all)
  • Verified copyright is correct on all changed files.
  • Added succinct git squash message before merging ref.
  • All template sections are filled out.
  • Optional: Additional screenshots for behavior/output changes with before/after.

Commit Type:

Check the conventional commit type
box here and add the label to the github PR.

  • build
  • ci
  • docs
  • feat
  • fix
  • perf
  • refactor
  • revert
  • style
  • test

Related PRs:

Where should the reviewer start?

Test plan:

Caveats:

Background

Seriously, I spent almost 4 hours to find out what's wrong with my config. I really need to look the proto file first, not the docs 😂

Related Issues: (use one of the action keywords Closes / Fixes / Resolves / Relates to)

  • closes GitHub issue: #xxx

as version_policy is message, it should not have colon after
field name
fixed the wrong pbtxt syntaxes to prevent the confusion

ref: https://github.com/triton-inference-server/common/blob/main/protobuf/model_config.proto#L617
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant