-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Arbitrary Precision LGL Basis #2128
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Review checklistThis checklist is meant to assist creators of PRs (to let them know what reviewers will typically look for) and reviewers (to guide them in a structured review process). Items do not need to be checked explicitly for a PR to be eligible for merging. Purpose and scope
Code quality
Documentation
Testing
Performance
Verification
Created with ❤️ by the Trixi.jl community. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just had a brief look.
Co-authored-by: Joshua Lampert <51029046+JoshuaLampert@users.noreply.github.com>
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2128 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 96.36% 96.36% -0.00%
==========================================
Files 480 480
Lines 38069 38084 +15
==========================================
+ Hits 36684 36697 +13
- Misses 1385 1387 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not a full review but I like the PR - cool idea!
This reverts commit 8103d0a.
Co-authored-by: Michael Schlottke-Lakemper <michael@sloede.com> Co-authored-by: Joshua Lampert <51029046+JoshuaLampert@users.noreply.github.com>
14'th order convergence test ( ####################################################################################################
l2
scalar
error EOC
6.50e-09 -
3.69e-13 14.10
2.76e-17 13.71
1.68e-21 14.00
1.03e-25 14.00
6.27e-30 14.00
1.16e-31 5.75
mean 12.59
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
linf
scalar
error EOC
5.36e-08 -
3.06e-12 14.09
3.26e-16 13.20
2.00e-20 13.99
1.24e-24 13.98
7.55e-29 14.00
2.19e-31 8.43
mean 12.95
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8'th order convergence ( ####################################################################################################
l2
scalar
error EOC
6.81e-11 -
2.63e-13 8.02
1.03e-15 8.00
4.01e-18 8.00
1.57e-20 8.00
6.12e-23 8.00
2.39e-25 8.00
mean 8.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
linf
scalar
error EOC
5.83e-10 -
2.34e-12 7.96
9.11e-15 8.00
3.58e-17 7.99
1.39e-19 8.01
5.46e-22 7.99
2.12e-24 8.01
mean 7.99
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
# For `TreeMesh` the datatype has to be specified explicitly | ||
mesh = TreeMesh(coordinates_min, coordinates_max, | ||
initial_refinement_level = 3, | ||
n_cells_max = 30_000, | ||
RealT = RealT) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we please collect an issue listing these differences between the TreeMesh
and the StructuredMesh
?
Convergence study: