Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update rust-wasm-bindgen monorepo #81

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 10, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
js-sys (source) dependencies patch 0.3.71 -> 0.3.72
wasm-bindgen (source) dependencies patch 0.2.94 -> 0.2.95
wasm-bindgen-futures (source) dependencies patch 0.4.44 -> 0.4.45

Release Notes

rustwasm/wasm-bindgen (wasm-bindgen)

v0.2.95

Compare Source

Released 2024-10-10

Added
  • Added support for implicit discriminants in enums.
    #​4152

  • Added support for Self in complex type expressions in methods.
    #​4155

Changed
  • String enums are no longer generate TypeScript types.
    #​4174
Fixed
  • Fixed generated setters from WebIDL interface attributes binding to wrong JS method names.
    #​4170

  • Fix string enums showing up in JS documentation and TypeScript bindings without corresponding types.
    #​4175



Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@tuna2134 tuna2134 merged commit 7663a75 into main Oct 10, 2024
9 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/rust-wasm-bindgen-monorepo branch October 10, 2024 23:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant