Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add suggestions when misspelling a record field #1710
Add suggestions when misspelling a record field #1710
Changes from all commits
8d9f05d
5a8d0ed
575fc89
8133ac5
a7299aa
7aeef2e
237e336
79e467b
09a3353
0d85f1e
d996791
2459798
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not related to this PR, but where is that
.$
coming from?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, good catch. In fact the operator wasn't shown before this PR (basically the
notes
were created but never used - it's unrelated to this PR, it's just that I needed to add the suggestion to the notes, so I realized, and it was in fact surprising that the rust compiler haven't yelled at me for unused value until now). So we might have let old names slipped through.I believe this was the original syntax for dynamic access field, like
foo.$x
was the currentfoo."%{x}"
, because we used to have$
as the interpolation character and we didn't have quoted fields yet, such asfoo."bar^baz"
. When we added the later syntax, it felt better to avoid keeping the strange.$
which could just be subsumed by quoted field access + interpolation.