use incremental to canonicalize versions for release

[altendky]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #329 (fad21ca) into master (dfaa241) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #329   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.78%   96.78%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        1183     1183           
  Branches      106      106           
=======================================
  Hits         1145     1145           
  Misses         20       20           
  Partials       18       18           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dfaa241...fad21ca. Read the comment docs.

[adiroiban]

I preferred to use some pip / stdlib / package version so that we don't have yet another version standard.

But as you are the maintainer of this library, I don't see any critical issue with this change.

I don't think that it's worth spending more time arguing about which version scheme is better.
We only have one life :)

Thanks!

[altendky]

I mentioned to @adiroiban that I am not particular attached to incremental. I just figured the branch etc names ought to match what will show up on PyPI and pip list etc. If we change that then yeah, I might tend back towards PEP440 normalization everywhere.