frame saliency #942
Merged
frame saliency #942
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
After briefly looking through the attack paper, it seems like applying this to the Ucf101 scenario might be more fitting? |
|
added a config for this. If I'm missing context though and there's a reason resisc was chosen, I'll delete. If not, and the purpose is simply to show an example usage of the attack, I think we can delete the resisc config |
|
Yeah, that makes sense. I was just doing a simple test and didn't want to incur video compute costs. |
|
If you're good, go ahead and merge. |
|
I'm going to remove the resisc frame saliency config since I assume we don't need two examples, and the attack is more relevant for ucf |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.