-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement EitherT#leftFlatMap and EitherT#leftSemiflatMap #1790
Merged
kailuowang
merged 3 commits into
typelevel:master
from
vendethiel:feature/either-leftflatmap-leftsemiflatmap
Sep 29, 2017
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -96,6 +96,18 @@ final case class EitherT[F[_], A, B](value: F[Either[A, B]]) { | |
|
||
def leftMap[C](f: A => C)(implicit F: Functor[F]): EitherT[F, C, B] = bimap(f, identity) | ||
|
||
def leftFlatMap[BB >: B, D](f: A => EitherT[F, D, BB])(implicit F: Monad[F]): EitherT[F, D, BB] = | ||
EitherT(F.flatMap(value) { | ||
case Left(a) => f(a).value | ||
case r@Right(_) => F.pure(r.leftCast) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
def leftSemiflatMap[D](f: A => F[D])(implicit F: Monad[F]): EitherT[F, D, B] = | ||
EitherT(F.flatMap(value) { | ||
case Left(a) => F.map(f(a)) { d => Left(d) } | ||
case r@Right(_) => F.pure(r.leftCast) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ditto, as above :) |
||
}) | ||
|
||
def compare(that: EitherT[F, A, B])(implicit o: Order[F[Either[A, B]]]): Int = | ||
o.compare(value, that.value) | ||
|
||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tiny nitpick, but can we change this to
case r: Right => ...
since we don't actually want to extract anything?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While in practice I don't think it matters, the use of
:
implies type casing which is generally used in contexts where parametricity is violated: https://typelevel.org/blog/2014/11/10/why_is_adt_pattern_matching_allowed.htmlI could have sworn there were some cases where
:
was allowed and ADT patmat wasn't but I can't remember.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very interesting article, thanks a lot! :)
I always thought that scalac transforms
case t: Type
into anisInstanceOf
check whereascase Type(_)
would be turned intoType.unapply(...)
, but that article shows that my assumption was false.It seems then, there's no real benefit to my suggestion, so disregard.