Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add automatic-module-name to relevant modules #281

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 26, 2018
Merged

Conversation

ZacSweers
Copy link
Collaborator

As described in http://branchandbound.net/blog/java/2017/12/automatic-module-name/

I'm not totally sure what to do with the ktx artifacts, as they're all purely extension functions but technically don't have different root packages. Open to suggestions. The android artifacts also have this applied, though more fore completeness since Android doesn't support java 9 anyway.

Also opportunistically fixed the error prone checker package from error.prone.checker to just errorprone. Previous name was unnecessarily pedantic and should be ok as far as semver goes since it's not supposed to be a dependency or manually wired anywhere

Zac Sweers added 3 commits November 21, 2018 21:17
This has been bothering me, and moving while we're at it. Not breaking since it's expected to be pick up via ServiceLoader and not a dependency
@ZacSweers ZacSweers self-assigned this Nov 22, 2018
@ZacSweers ZacSweers changed the title Z/module system Add automatic-module-name to relevant modules Nov 24, 2018
@jbarr21 jbarr21 self-requested a review November 26, 2018 23:41
Copy link
Collaborator

@jbarr21 jbarr21 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems ok to me

@ZacSweers ZacSweers merged commit 3b34830 into master Nov 26, 2018
@ZacSweers ZacSweers deleted the z/moduleSystem branch November 26, 2018 23:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants