-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: ✏️ remove some nested if #1706
Conversation
Walkthrough此次更改引入了两个主要功能:在 Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
WalkthroughThis pull request refactors code by removing nested Changes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
crates/mako/src/plugins/duplicate_package_checker.rs (2)
50-72
: 函数实现清晰,但建议增强错误处理代码使用 Option 链式调用很好地处理了空值情况,实现了关注点分离。不过有以下几点建议:
- 建议对
semver::Version::parse
的错误进行更详细的处理,而不是简单地用ok()?
忽略raw_json
变量名可以更具描述性,比如package_metadata
建议按如下方式改进错误处理:
- let version = semver::Version::parse(version.as_str().unwrap()).ok()?; + let version_str = version.as_str().ok_or_else(|| "version must be a string")?; + let version = semver::Version::parse(version_str) + .map_err(|e| format!("invalid version format: {}", e)) + .ok()?;
120-123
: 代码简化得当,可考虑性能优化使用
filter_map
和新的extract_package_info
函数成功简化了代码,提高了可读性。不过对于大型模块图,可以考虑以下优化:
- 考虑使用
par_iter()
进行并行处理- 可以直接使用
collect()
而不是for_each
和push
建议改进如下:
- .filter_map(extract_package_info) - .for_each(|package_info| { - packages.push(package_info); - }); + .filter_map(extract_package_info) + .collect::<Vec<_>>();如果需要并行处理,可以考虑引入
rayon
:use rayon::prelude::*; // ... .par_iter() .filter_map(extract_package_info) .collect::<Vec<_>>();
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
crates/mako/src/plugins/duplicate_package_checker.rs
(3 hunks)crates/mako/src/visitors/async_module.rs
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
crates/mako/src/visitors/async_module.rs (1)
221-221
: 使用 then
方法简化逻辑
第 221 行中,使用 then
方法对 Option
进行了链式调用,简化了代码逻辑,提升了可读性。
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1706 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 55.28% 55.28%
=======================================
Files 175 175
Lines 17696 17699 +3
=======================================
+ Hits 9783 9785 +2
- Misses 7913 7914 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Summary by CodeRabbit
新功能
extract_package_info
函数,以简化包信息的提取逻辑。require
调用的处理,增强了对异步依赖的管理。改进
check_duplicates
方法,简化了包信息提取的流程。mark_async
函数,提升了异步模块的识别和依赖收集逻辑。