Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade eslint from 8.57.0 to 9.0.0 #208

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2024

Conversation

OhmSpectator
Copy link
Member

@OhmSpectator OhmSpectator commented Apr 5, 2024

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • backend/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 631/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.2
Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
SNYK-JS-INFLIGHT-6095116
Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: eslint The new version differs by 231 commits.
  • e0cbc50 9.0.0
  • 75cb5f4 Build: changelog update for 9.0.0
  • 19f9a89 chore: Update dependencies for v9.0.0 (#18275)
  • 7c957f2 chore: package.json update for @ eslint/js release
  • d73a33c chore: ignore `/docs/v8.x` in link checker (#18274)
  • d54a412 feat: Add --inspect-config CLI flag (#18270)
  • e151050 docs: update get-started to the new `@ eslint/create-config` (#18217)
  • 610c148 fix: Support `using` declarations in no-lone-blocks (#18269)
  • 44a81c6 chore: upgrade knip (#18272)
  • 94178ad docs: mention about `name` field in flat config (#18252)
  • 1765c24 docs: add Troubleshooting page (#18181)
  • e80b60c chore: remove code for testing version selectors (#18266)
  • 96607d0 docs: version selectors synchronization (#18260)
  • e508800 fix: rule tester ignore irrelevant test case properties (#18235)
  • a129acb fix: flat config name on ignores object (#18258)
  • 97ce45b feat: Add `reportUsedIgnorePattern` option to `no-unused-vars` rule (#17662)
  • 651ec91 docs: remove `/* eslint-env */` comments from rule examples (#18249)
  • 950c4f1 docs: Update README
  • 3e9fcea feat: Show config names in error messages (#18256)
  • b7cf3bd fix!: correct `camelcase` rule schema for `allow` option (#18232)
  • 12f5746 docs: add info about dot files and dir in flat config (#18239)
  • b93f408 docs: update shared settings example (#18251)
  • 26384d3 docs: fix `ecmaVersion` in one example, add checks (#18241)
  • 7747097 docs: Update PR review process (#18233)

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated eslint to version 9.0.0 for improved code quality checks.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The update involves a significant change in the backend project's configuration. The eslint package was upgraded from version 8.54.0 to 9.0.0, indicating potential improvements, new features, or critical fixes in the code linting process that could impact code quality maintenance and enhancement.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
backend/package.json Upgraded eslint from 8.54.0 to 9.0.0

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

sweep-ai bot commented Apr 5, 2024

Apply Sweep Rules to your PR?

  • Apply: All new business logic should have corresponding unit tests.
  • Apply: Add jsdoc to all functions and file headers.

This is an automated message generated by Sweep AI.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 31c3c2e and 178915c.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • backend/package.json (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
backend/package.json (2)

7-7: Upgrade of eslint to ^9.0.0 is correctly implemented. Ensure compatibility with the project's linting configurations and custom rules.


4-10: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-43]

The overall structure and configuration of the package.json file, including dependencies, scripts, and metadata, are well-organized and follow best practices.

@OhmSpectator OhmSpectator force-pushed the snyk-fix-f6e405d2730043259d13c2fb60d7ac81 branch from 178915c to aba7c3d Compare April 6, 2024 09:23
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a13d07e and aba7c3d.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • backend/package.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • backend/package.json

@OhmSpectator OhmSpectator merged commit 8837833 into main Apr 6, 2024
14 checks passed
@OhmSpectator OhmSpectator deleted the snyk-fix-f6e405d2730043259d13c2fb60d7ac81 branch April 6, 2024 09:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants