-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
config terminal simulation for specific stdios only #6125
config terminal simulation for specific stdios only #6125
Conversation
1b2dd29
to
807ae04
Compare
807ae04
to
684e1f9
Compare
684e1f9
to
08900b0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a typo.
I must admit that I don't quite understand yet how this fixes the problem in #6121, but if @tertsdiepraam says so, then I'm sure it makes sense.
GNU testsuite comparison:
|
08900b0
to
4bcd8cc
Compare
GNU testsuite comparison:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks for handling the typo!
Since I don't understand the context of this PR, I don't want to be the person who clicks "merge". I suggest @tertsdiepraam instead. :)
22f3b37
to
e86dfdd
Compare
GNU testsuite comparison:
|
e86dfdd
to
537941b
Compare
@tertsdiepraam @BenWiederhake please review + merge if fine |
as discussed in PR #6121, it makes sense for tests to have more fine granular control over the terminal simulation.
This PR improves this.