Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add "active" to each Patient and set it to true. #9

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mcjustin
Copy link
Member

We're switching COSRI to use ACTIVE_PATIENT_FLAG, so for these patients to appear there, they need 'active' = true.

Copy link
Member

@ivan-c ivan-c left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mcjustin
sorry for the confusion, but this data isn't related to the NCPDP SCRIPT mock data that allows us to launch with test patients from cosri-patientsearch

the data in this Bundle is the "EHR" data we upload this data to the SoF App Gallery, so we can launch cosri from the gallery with a representative patient that triggers the alerts etc specific to cosri

@mcjustin
Copy link
Member Author

@mcjustin sorry for the confusion, but this data isn't related to the NCPDP SCRIPT mock data that allows us to launch with test patients from cosri-patientsearch

the data in this Bundle is the "EHR" data we upload this data to the SoF App Gallery, so we can launch cosri from the gallery with a representative patient that triggers the alerts etc specific to cosri

@ivan-c ah thanks... As I read https://github.com/uwcirg/pdmp-mock-data/blob/main/20170701/marcus-aurelius-1975-06-17.xml , it's not clear to me whether that maps into FHIR, i.e. that adding <Active>true</Active> within <HumanPatient> is going to have the desired effect. What do you think? I expect I'll need to migrate many Patients to have this anyways, not sure of the value here.

Copy link
Contributor

@pbugni pbugni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look clean and correct to me, but if @ivan-c 's comment above is correct, this PR may not be needed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants